Z
Zypur
Guest
Example: Would you kill a man if there was no laws stopping you? If not laws, then what is stopping you?
Fear isn't the only solution.
The thought that their life had a meaning.
I'd kill a man if there were no consequences, for sure. Hell, that's why I'm joining the military now.
You don't need laws to stop you from doing something, just common sense.
You don't need laws to stop you from doing something, just common sense.
All our lives we have grew up in a society where we know if we do something wrong we would have consequences. If w where raised in a community that was not based on laws and you could kill if you wanted or steal what you needed people would use it to their advantage and every day our society would fall to a rapid decline due to the mass amounts of murders.
I doubt it.
Consequences don't need to be legally defined. It might not be against the law for me to insult someone, but it doesn't mean I'll run about doing it.
But the question is can morality exist without law, and if he feels that there is something restraining him from doing something "immoral" outside of legality, he is able to state that it can exist.
Exactly, him. He can not speak on the behalf of others but only himself.
All I'm saying is that you don't need a legal document entitled "LAW" for people to create rules and consequences for themselves.
And your opinions are all-encompassing and universal? Bullshit. This sort of argument is just plain illogical; after all, everyone in the debate forum is arguing from their perspective, not the grand and illusive perspective of "EVERYONE" as you seem to believe.
I'd kill a man if there were no consequences, for sure. Hell, that's why I'm joining the military now.
I would kill a man if their wasn't a law. I don't see the difference in killing an animal and a human, since we are the same things.
If that was supposed to be an insult, I'm confused. If it wasn't, I'd point out that I'm not an anarchist.People would kill if there weren't laws and your 'freedom fighting' bull shit doesn't impress anyone.
You seem to be misinterpreting the logic behind this topic. It's not a rebellion or a rally for anarchism- merely a philosophical debate. Welcome to the SFA.Those who try to be a rebel on the internet... I don't need to finish.
Consequences don't need to be legally defined. It might not be against the law for me to insult someone, but it doesn't mean I'll run about doing it.

