I can flat out say, I have NO association with the worker in question, and RuneFarm will take zero direct responsibility in the matter, but rather
@skilling scott will. I do however owe
@Ed g3in a PORTION of a job he worked on, despite his pleads for the full payment when he didn't complete the job, will be uploading and posting any screenshots necessary to help out in that matter.
AS for his deposit, he agreed to a
contract, which he is to uphold: within which,
he agreed that his deposit is to be held for 3 days after he is working on a customers account. Currently, he was on one of mine, as well as one of Scott's personal HCIM I believe - on which, he threatened to kill the character and lose hardcore status out of anger and spite - also I will post screenshots of the messages he sent me in regards to that - So I will also be reviewing the contract again myself to see if this may have broken any terms of sorts, which is my right, in which case, his deposit would be forfeit anyhow (will keep this updated as well if I deem this necessary after reviewing.)
Long story short from my end, I work a full-time job IRL as well, so do Scott and our other business partner, although again, this is IRRELEVANT as the worker wasn't even a worker from RuneFarm... But on that note, he spammed practically every category in the entire server saying his account had been banned. (Note again please, he is a worker, so this is incredibly BAD PR in a server of 250+ people, and also it was NOT an order taken on by a verified RuneFarm worker.
[ALL WORKERS ARE BOUND BY CONTRACTS, WHICH THE ACCUSER IS AWARE OF AS HE TOO IS BOUND BY ONE, THE WORKER IN QUESTION WOULD NOT HAVE RECEIVED AN OFFICIAL SYTHE VERIFICATION, NOR BEEN ADDED TO OUR OFFICIAL VERIFIED WORKERS LIST WITHIN THE SERVER EITHER]
So, naturally, being at work, and seeing the FLOOD of spam saying his account was banned, an account of which I wasn't even aware was being worked on AT ALL by us, was banned, to which yes, I told him tough luck, not my problem, you're fired for spamming my server with your problems, and banned as well (to resolve the issue for myself easily being that again I was at work and hopefully this would stop the spam from occurring.)
Since all of this, he has continuously spammed me calling me any sort of random insult he can think of and all sorts of other ignorance directed towards my IRL situation, which he legitimately knows no true information towards, but regardless, there is zero reason for him to be spamming me, I've messaged Scott to ask what job was paid for because he just started spamming me NOW (Roughly 4AM, now 4:15AM) requesting payment, which was 44M for the job he DID NOT complete, which I told him I would pay him his PORTION of which he was, yet he is for some strange reason still messaging me asking for the money I 'owe' him. Despite the only money that I owe him is either yet to be calculated, or OVERPAID by Scott, in which case, the overage WILL be deducted from his deposit upon return as well. Calculations will all be provided as well as pricing sheets to show the math as to what the payment actually equals.
I personally can say after this interaction, I would NEVER do any sort of trades with this absolute ridiculous person, especially being that he seems to just want to find somebody to point blame at for something we realistically have no proof even occurred other than him stating he got banned for botting, which he very well could have done himself. (He's informed me he has a better main this was just an alt account for him, so I'm sure he wouldn't mind botting and attempting to seek full value, no guarantee on either end, which is why it is generally included within the terms and conditions of service providers that bans are not our responsibility to cover.
Within the Terms and Conditions Scott sent you for the order as well, he is NOT liable for any bans. The service refund on the other hand, sure, we can work that out I'm sure. So the refund for that would be 65M - On top of the remainder of the money owed between the accuser and myself.
*
No refunds is ALSO a term within the Terms and Conditions, so Ed should take this as a sign of good faith - REFERENCE FOR FUTURE POTENTIAL REPORTS TO ANYBODY WHO ORDERS SERVICES FROM ANY PROVIDER: PLEASE REVIEW ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS WHEN PLACING THE ORDER, ESPECIALLY WHEN PROVIDED DIRECTLY TO YOU! *
(Again Scott should be willing to refund 65M for his service, myself potentially his 50M deposit pending review, and a total of 44M minus deductions for incomplete work of course.)