Autobumpers game changing "BAN"

[Mr. Fox]

I'm sure you could find an autobumper on your own then. It would be much more manageable to enforce.

This thread is not about my ability of being able to autobump, I can apply it to my services very easily without it being detected if I were to go down that path and so can anyone else adequate.
I'm here just giving feedback and seeking for a conversation on how this rule is being enforced.
To me it seems like the lazy and low quality services keep spamming while the dedicated have to take it up theirs for abiding by the Sythe rules.

 

Hello,

You should build a case, if you think that you have enough evidence to suggest that some users use autobumpers and it will be looked into.

I understand that you don't want to make any enemies, so perhaps post it as a guest.

 

[Sypherz]

This thread is not about my ability of being able to autobump, I can apply it to my services very easily without it being detected if I were to go down that path and so can anyone else adequate.
I'm here just giving feedback and seeking for a conversation on how this rule is being enforced.
To me it seems like the lazy and low quality services keep spamming while the dedicated have to take it up theirs for abiding by the Sythe rules.

Fair enough. In my opinion, it's so difficult to enforce that allowing everyone to compete with autobumpers but regulating the software itself is the most manageable approach.

 

[S]

Nearly all of your suggestions/feedback posts are filled with childish angst, if not met with support/validation. You resort to instantly attacking users, maintain a consistent condescending aura, believe belittling users will get you far, and most importantly, think you're right without a doubt, when in reality, thats simply your uninformed opinion.

Also, to note, we asked for examples. We, well I, have not agreed/disagreed with you as yet...as there is no evidence to your claim(s).

Stop posting pointless threads if you refuse to make a proper case, alongside lashing out at everyone who disagrees with you.

 

[ShawnIsThaBeast]

Deleted

 

[Mr. Fox]

Hello,

You should build a case, if you think that you have enough evidence to suggest that some users use autobumpers and it will be looked into.

I understand that you don't want to make any enemies, so perhaps post it as a guest.

Hello!

Again, what's the point of public lynching aka "creating a case"? Everybody here is aware of the problem or are not denying it. There's no need for a "case" for the moderators to enforce their rules. If the moderators cannot enforce their rules, then maybe something should be done about it?
It's not the donors duty to constantly browse and snitch, it's your job to make sure that everyone's playing on a level playing field when abiding by the rules. Luckily you have plenty of nice donors on this site who are willing to do moderation work for free without the badge, so if you want "cases", you have people on the first page with private messages open.

Nearly all of your suggestions/feedback posts are filled with childish angst, if not met with support/validation. You resort to instantly attacking users, maintain a consistent condescending aura, believe belittling users will get you far, and most importantly, think you're right without a doubt, when in reality, thats simply your uninformed opinion.

Also, to note, we asked for examples. We, well I, have not agreed/disagreed with you as yet...as there is no evidence to your claim(s).

Stop posting pointless threads if you refuse to make a proper case, alongside lashing out at everyone who disagrees with you.

Or stop being a carebear.

 

[Rico Bronson]

Of course you don't care! Every thread you enter you get slapped and then moan how you don't care.

Funny internet man is shaking head so I must be wrong.

LMAO I love this site