Interested`In-it.
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 118
Nothing wrong with it...
Agreed
Nothing wrong with it...
LMFAO? I notice a big difference in hit frequency the higher your attack is.
For that reason, I value attack a ton more than I value strength. Any pure I have ever had (with the exception of my black pure from RSC) has had higher attack than strength, and has owned ANYONE anywhere near the same level as it. Strength nerds are gonna flame me now![]()
you ever wonder why pures stay 60 attack? because getting more attack levels is the biggest waste of combat levels there is
I wonder why ex. Boxing staker train attack then, when the precious levels could be used elsewhere? Unless it matters.
Try to kill a, say, Black Knight with 1 attack & iron scimitar. Now go do the same with 99 attack & iron scimitar. Which hits more frequently? Thought so.
I'm upset because you provide no argument in reply to mine. You simply spam with "Attack is underpowered, k?"
Oh, wait, I mean, Errrrrrr EEEEEHHHH AWWWWW DURRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR ERRRRR
You raging cause you lost a stake to someone with 60-80-60 when you have 70-60-70??
I made my max zerker a main because of the difference from 75 attack and 99 attack, which was nothing, also with turmoil and 99 atk i still seemed 2 be hitting not often at all
very mature
Why did you get attack? it isn't that hard to hit other ONE DEFENCE pures.

