Amd Vs Intel

[Noodles :)]

I see a lot of uneducated posts...
Just because you've never had an Intel is no reason to say AMD is better.



I edited that for you..

+1. Intel have been in lead since the core2's came out if I'm not mistaken.

 

[MicroScan]

This thread is a joke. Intel is a powerhorse of amazing products, if money isn't an issue.

 

[Bubba Fuzz]

Personally Intel, I have used them for a long time and they have never lead me astray. I have heard some good things about AMD though.

 

[Ivy Bridge]

I'm currently running a laptop that has an AMD A6-3400 quad coreAPU with a stock clock speed of 1.4GHz. I have it overclocked and running smooth & cool at 2.8GHz, and can play every game out there at max settings on the integrated graphics. This is on a 400$ laptop. So yeah, I'm going to say AMD>Intel

Are you trollin? Is that processor even overclockable? I know it has a turbo but I had no idea it could overclock. Even so a 100% increase in speed seems HIGHLY unlikely and you running games at max settings at anything higher than like 800x600 seems even more unlikely. Either that or the most demanding game you play is RS @ 720p or something lol.

I love that no one can agree on which is better quality. >_>.

Just saw this post. Yeah, that's unfortunately true. Everybody ignores the benchmarks on similarly priced processors and tries to compare like a Phenom II X4 965 to a 990X, which isn't really fair at all. I mean I can go on and on and spit out facts here and there to support my position that Intel is superior but I will just be quoted by a person who has an AMD system wanting to reassure their purchase followed by illegitimate reasoning/comparisons.