Amd Vs Intel

[Lillie_Services]

I prefer AMD because I built my own PC and I had to pay for it while I had no job.
It was definitely cheaper for me and I was always going with Intel so I decided to change.

I'm surprised by AMD because it brought me to an awesome gaming experience. Even though that I'm pretty sure Intel beats AMD, I wouldn't change for now, unless someone give it to me for free

 

[Terrankiller]

I use AMD. AMD is cheaper and usually the same or better quality than Intel. Though the thing is with AMD CPU it does not beep when it is over heating unlike Intel from my experience lol.

 

[Nicodr007]

Did you even read what I said? You literally just became the stereotype I described in my post.

Intel makes mid ranged products too.

Intel Core i3 2100
AMD Phenom II X4 955

Two similarly priced processors, except that the i3 2100 performs better in the majority of applications despite only being a dual core and not being clocked as high as its AMD counterpart. It does significantly better in gaming as well. Really the only places the AMD CPU beats it is in highly threaded applications (which most day-to-day programs aren't). You will only benefit from having the AMD processor if you like do a lot of video editing or a lot of Winrar archiving or something like that. That's really the only kinds of places the AMD shines. Not to mention Intel has more technologies available on its boards like SRT for example, which is amazing.

Point is, price/performance may be a tiny (almost insignificantly so) bit better on the AMD side of things but just because they make mostly high end processors doesn't mean they don't also have comparable prices in the mid ranged market, which really is all that AMD offers.. they have zero high end processors whatsoever, leaving not much to compare CPUs like the 990X to on the AMD side.

you doign it wrong

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition Processor - Six Core, 6MB L3 Cache, 3MB L2 Cache, 3.30GHz, Socket AM3, 125W, Fan, Unlocked, Retail Price: 200 USD


Intel Core i5-2300 Processor - Quad Core, 6MB L3 Cache, 1MB L2 Cache, 2.80 GHz (3.10 GHz Max Turbo), Socket H2 (LGA1155), 95W, Fan, Retail price : 189 USD

 

[jimmy riddle]

Seeing as i have only had AMD processors before so my vote went to that
Also have a PC ordered which has the AMD phenom II x4 665

 

[ManyGash]

Last month, AMD said an eight-core Bulldozer microprocessor broke the world record for clock speed by running at 8.429GHz. The system was cooled by tanks of liquid helium.

source: Click Here

I have always voted AMD. Just a preferred option.

 

[Nicodr007]

source: Click Here

I have always voted AMD. Just a preferred option.

AMD win a lawsuit on intel of 100 million + 2 year ago.

 

[Ivy Bridge]

you doign it wrong

AMD Phenom II X6 1100T Black Edition Processor - Six Core, 6MB L3 Cache, 3MB L2 Cache, 3.30GHz, Socket AM3, 125W, Fan, Unlocked, Retail Price: 200 USD


Intel Core i5-2300 Processor - Quad Core, 6MB L3 Cache, 1MB L2 Cache, 2.80 GHz (3.10 GHz Max Turbo), Socket H2 (LGA1155), 95W, Fan, Retail price : 189 USD

What are you talking about? Are you even reading my posts before replying?

A more appropriate comparison to the 1100T would be the i5 2500k, which spanks it as shown in this benchmark: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=203

Count 'em up. It lost like 3/37 benchmarks at a cost of $20 more, which one could argue is easily worth it when you consider the technologies on the Intel chipsets. Not to mention that chip hits 5GHz easy whereas the 1100T is lucky to hit 4.2GHz before blowing up.

Even the i5 2400 (exact same price as 1100T) does better in the vast majority of benchies: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/363?vs=203 most notably the game benchmarks it absolutely rips through the 1100T.

 

[Nicodr007]

What are you talking about? Are you even reading my posts before replying?

A more appropriate comparison to the 1100T would be the i5 2500k, which spanks it as shown in this benchmark: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/288?vs=203

Count 'em up. It lost like 3/37 benchmarks at a cost of $20 more, which one could argue is easily worth it when you consider the technologies on the Intel chipsets. Not to mention that chip hits 5GHz easy whereas the 1100T is lucky to hit 4.2GHz before blowing up.

Even the i5 2400 (exact same price as 1100T) does better in the vast majority of benchies: http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/363?vs=203 most notably the game benchmarks it absolutely rips through the 1100T.

I dont know a lot about Intel CPU since i hate them... all i know is that Intel have a better technology in mn and Intel have a better technology since they dont have pins on CPU but contact something

 

[Ivy Bridge]

I dont know a lot about Intel CPU since i hate them... all i know is that Intel have a better technology in mn and Intel have a better technology since they dont have pins on CPU but contact something

You hate them.... why? They perform better at negligibly more cost. You don't like more performance?

 

[Laptop65]

Intel clearly, they are more based on performance than AMD. Although I will admit AMD is cheaper.

 

[SuF]

I love that no one can agree on which is better quality. >_>.

 

[Nicodr007]

You hate them.... why? They perform better at negligibly more cost. You don't like more performance?

There no answer at this question.... Sometimes you hate somehtign for nothing...

 

[Bubba Fuzz]

They're both great but I normally use Intel and I have had no problems with them. They get my vote.

 

[Noodles :)]

Intel are far superior.

Another thing Ivy is missing out on, the core2quads(like 4years old) perform pretty much exactly the same as PII x4's.

If you're doing a build $700 or under AMD is the go, $800+ would be intel.

It's proven that intel perform better.
I'd use something I hated if it provided such a big performance boost for a little bit more cash.

 

[kill dank]

source: Click Here

I have always voted AMD. Just a preferred option.

Look at any benchmark comparing that 8 core to the i7 2600k. The QUAD CORE 2600k beats the shit out of that 8 CORE any day.

AMD Opteron 6176 SE ~ $1600
Intel Core i7 990X ~ $1000


Compare those anywhere. They're pretty much the best for each brand. Even when AMD comes out with a "high end" processor, they still can't compare to the high end Intels.

People say AMD is a better price/performance ratio, but when you're looking at high end processors and actually considering benchmarks like most intelligent people, it's not even a contest. Intel still outclasses.

There no answer at this question.... Sometimes you hate somehtign for nothing...

So hate without reason or logic... That's really what this world needs eh?

 

[Hugz4totz]

I'm currently running a laptop that has an AMD A6-3400 quad coreAPU with a stock clock speed of 1.4GHz. I have it overclocked and running smooth & cool at 2.8GHz, and can play every game out there at max settings on the integrated graphics. This is on a 400$ laptop. So yeah, I'm going to say AMD>Intel

 

[Zerkerfist]

My laptops running on an AMD 8 processor and this is by far the fastest computer I have had in along time. It runs everything I need it to flawlessly, and has tons of space for storing my music and movie files, and it runs Runescape like a dream Even though I've heard Intel is the superior company, I am .more than impressed with AMD right now and would probably use them again

 

[Noodles :)]

I'm currently running a laptop that has an AMD A6-3400 quad coreAPU with a stock clock speed of 1.4GHz. I have it overclocked and running smooth & cool at 2.8GHz, and can play every game out there at max settings on the integrated graphics. This is on a 400$ laptop. So yeah, I'm going to say AMD>Intel

Yeah, sure you can. ._.
Go run Crysis 1/2 or Metro 2033 and watch it get like 5fps on max.
You must tolerate low framerates lol...

 

[Rawrasaurus]

Ivy Bridge kicking ass ITT.

Personally I prefer intel. My i5 750 runs everything I throw at it, best purchase I've ever made PC related.

 

[kill dank]

I see a lot of uneducated posts...
Just because you've never had an Intel is no reason to say AMD is better.

I'm currently running a laptop that has an AMD A6-3400 quad coreAPU with a stock clock speed of 1.4GHz. I have it overclocked and running smooth & cool at 2.8GHz, and can play every Facebook game out there and Runescape at max settings on the integrated graphics. This is on a 400$ laptop. So yeah, I'm going to say AMD<Intel

I edited that for you..