Alexander messing up again..

My new worker is unaware of the risks of trading it seems, and he got scammed via an impostor of @alxender but Alex also didn't PM him correctly.

I am making this to help him explain.

I have explained briefly about the third party scam that happened here, but I still feel Alexnder should be placed under TWC for poor trade practice. It's quite clear you should be confirming your Skype ID not just chat logs to make sure the customer is not being scammed.

 

[alxender]

look my signature show my skype name clearely

your worker scame this skype name huge differnce
Screenshot - af67d50933a47f7aa05330327f966171 - Gyazo



Edit

PMs are no longer required for Skype proofs!

 

look my signature show my skype name clearely

your worker scame this skype name huge differnce
Screenshot - af67d50933a47f7aa05330327f966171 - Gyazo

I know, I said he was scammed by an impostor. Learn to read before you comment back.

I am stating the facts, your poor trade practice. It makes no difference if it's in your signature or not, the fact will remain you are meant to confirm your contact details not a copy and paste of chat logs.

 

This example is a recent PM on OSbot I sent out @alxender , hopefully you can understand what i'm referring to after this. My profile and my signature both hold my Skype ID, but I still make sure to confirm via PM with people to avoid any possible hacking, scamming, impostor problems or anything else as should you.

This is why I am stating poor trade practice.

About to edit this and add a couple of things below the top image.

https://osbot.org/forum/uploads/mon...t(1).gif.913eeee2997133bba659b33c56ccaea6.gif

- It wont let me show my signature, but there is the link to open.

 

[Champ]

@alxender Regardless of your Skype being posted, your PM is very poor, and is "Poor trading practices." Therefore, you have been placed with a TWC.

We have threads for a PM template and we expect it to be followed, especially by people actively in the market. You can view that thread here.

If you disagree with this TWC, you are welcome to dispute it here.