[ADMIN] Govind's Autoclicker

[SomeFormOfHuman]

Hmm...I may buy due to the fact that auto clickers are versatile.

It also seems that you have good reviews/rep.

 

[Govind]

To clarify, this is best used in a zone like a house with building mode on or Soul Wars.

 

[BeeStar]

Can you set it to autoclick a series of clicks or can it only click on one area?

Also, may I suggest you let the user input the pixel range?

 

[weequ]

Dungeoneering bank is also randomfree and it's f2p.

 

[Emperor Nero]

In my opinion this is overpriced for it's functionality. Maybe if it was useful for something in game beyond doing simple alching and things like that, but for macroing purposes I think they're cheaper alternatives.

 

[Phantom866]

I agree with Nero. It may be a good program, but it doesn't seem feature-rich enough to be worth $4.50 USD.
An old, verified program, Zetra's autoclicker still works.

 

[Govind]

Ok, well, I'm working on other bots atm too.

Feel free to use what you wish, but please don't advertise competitor products on my thread >_>

 

[Phantom866]

Fair enough, removed link. I wasn't advertising anyway, it's public info. And Zetra hasn't worked on it in a very long time.

 

[Profound CW]

Looks pretty cool, good idea with the offset pixel.

 

[pure chi]

As long as you don't try to autoclick for 5 hours+ in one go, I'm sure you'll be fine. I love the random millisecond option though, +1 =D

 

[Govind]

Price reduced a bit. I'm aware this isn't an amazing bot, but it works, and I do need the cash.

Anyone who bought this bot already and wants $1.51 of the original $4.50 refunded, PM me.

I've got bigger and better things in development including:
Auto Woodcutter
Auto Miner
Auto Fighter
etc etc

 

Price reduced a bit. I'm aware this isn't an amazing bot, but it works, and I do need the cash.

Anyone who bought this bot already and wants $1.51 of the original $4.50 refunded, PM me.

I've got bigger and better things in development including:
Auto Woodcutter
Auto Miner
Auto Fighter
etc etc

I hope to god you're not doing those in C++. Your code could be reduced by half if you used C# or VB.

 

[TD Reach]

So you say this is 100% undetectable? If I get banned can I get a refund?

 

[rally]

i doubt it 100% undetectable, it prolly took longer to make the gui than the coding of that program, good job nonetheless.

 

[Cami3532]

I would like something like this if you could do multiple different location clicks, right clicks, different stuff like that.

Sort of like ghost mouse but being able to loop it, and including the different pixel settings and the difference between clicks in milliseconds.

 

[Sprawl]

holy crap, auto clickers? Feels like I jumped into a time machine.

 

[dark idiot]

how confident are you that its 100% undetectable?

 

[Govind]

My old one was (according to the several hundred users it had) and this one is based on the same code base. The only difference is that this one has -more- undetectability features (the pixel offset, namely)

 

[Govind]

I hope to god you're not doing those in C++. Your code could be reduced by half if you used C# or VB.

Not C++, C actually. I've made a static linker library with a ton of SCAR-like functions, so most of the code is already there.

 

[FeCoola]

Can you make a new thread with the progress of your new bots? Will you be making money making bots as well?