Accusing of scamming without evidence infraction.

Discussion in 'Dispute Forum Archive' started by Mountain Goat, May 31, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Accusing of scamming without evidence infraction.
  1. Unread #1 - May 31, 2010 at 6:59 AM
  2. Mountain Goat
    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2010
    Posts:
    228
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Mountain Goat Active Member

    Accusing of scamming without evidence infraction.

    Here's where it happened. - http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=6470586#post6470586

    I posted saying he was a scammer with out evidence because at the time he was banned. Now that he is unbanned i will post evidence. I feel that my infraction should be lifted because he was banned at the time and i did feel it necessary to post evidence.

    Thank you, Mountain goat.
     
  3. Unread #2 - May 31, 2010 at 2:00 PM
  4. Sindrefyrn
    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2008
    Posts:
    2,542
    Referrals:
    11
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Sindrefyrn Power, Wisdom and Courage.
    Do Not Trade

    Accusing of scamming without evidence infraction.

    The rules say you'll have to post evidence. You can't "feel like" not follow them.
    Warranted.
     
< lol you gave me another infraction after reversing the same post?? | for ^Gucci >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site