"Accusing of scamming with proof"

Discussion in 'Dispute Forum Archive' started by Colmanpwnz, May 1, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
"Accusing of scamming with proof"
  1. Unread #1 - May 1, 2009 at 9:10 AM
  2. Colmanpwnz
    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Posts:
    1,627
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Colmanpwnz Guru
    Banned

    "Accusing of scamming with proof"

  3. Unread #2 - May 1, 2009 at 9:31 AM
  4. Sin666
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Posts:
    6,989
    Referrals:
    21
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    Two Factor Authentication User Detective Heidy

    Sin666 Hero
    Crabby Retired Administrator

    "Accusing of scamming with proof"

    1. It's a warning.
    2. The fact that he scammed does not change the infraction.

    I assume most people who post claims are telling the truth; however, the accusation is not useful unless it contains proof, and in fact, it's often quite unhelpful when it sparks a back-and-forth accusation/flame war.

    It's not just about hurting someone's reputation; there are many reasons why this rule is in place, and even though your claim was true, you still broke the rule you were warned for.
     
< infraction??????? | My warning >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site