About delayed payment on dicing.

@Sythe As i see Artur paid 5m fee for delaying couple minutes to pay dice bet .

TWC Artur

So please check that report about gun . Which he paid me after 4-5 hours delay .

'Gun' logged after losing at dice . TWC Request.

 

I am asking for Gun refund artur's 5m or pay me a fee too .

 

[Biofighter]

@Sythe As i see Artur paid 5m fee for delaying couple minutes to pay dice bet .

TWC Artur

So please check that report about gun . Which he paid me after 4-5 hours delay .

'Gun' logged after losing at dice . TWC Request.

As shown by the precdent set in Mootruck v Gun, you're not eligible for compensation for your loss in time due to the rule being created from the case. I approached Richard about a similar circumstance as yours and he quoted me this: Nulla poena sine lege - Wikipedia

 

• If a payment method is stated, you must have the required funds available for that payment method in order to dice.

This rule was always there @Biofighter

 

[Gun]

There's a difference. I was at work and had the gold! haha!

He didn't have any gold at all!

 

How can i know that you had the gold ? And didnt buy the gold in that "4 hour" delay ? @Gun

And you told it was stresfull since he was disconnecting on discord, what about you didnt reply me in that 4 hours?

 

[Gun]

How can i know that you had the gold ? And didnt buy the gold in that "4 hour" delay ? @Gun

haha trust me dude i had it!

 

[Biofighter]

I don't like infractions so this will be my last input.

"i also changed the rule to require immediate payments so this doesnt happen again" -superfluous

From this it appears the rule was adjusted DUE to your report, thus ^ everything I said above.


My 2 cents.

 

i also changed the rule to require immediate payments so this doesnt happen again" -superfluous = Is not the same rule , he added a rule about timely payment

The • If a payment method is stated, you must have the required funds available for that payment method in order to dice. Was always there , thanks . @Biofighter

 

[John Devola]

@Service Rs As you can see at the bottom of your thread. The rule of IMMEDIATE payment was only instituted after your dispute was talked over by staff, you cant make him pay for a rule that was implemented as a result of dispute and not before your dispute was made.

@Sythe I really hope you re-think this whole Gun situation. I really dont know any history, but all I see is him creating trouble for this community. I dont know how on earth any of you supported his pardon, maybe you all like doing more work and causing more headaches for the community. I dont know.

Anyway ban me for this but this is my 2 cents.

 

Sorry going to deny this.

There's a new rule now in which payment mus be immediate.

You may talk privately among each other about payment, but if there's a report on someone who is stalling to pay they will be banned instantly.

If pay is not immediate you will be banned until you have paid out.

 

[Superfluous]

i also changed the rule to require immediate payments so this doesnt happen again" -superfluous = Is not the same rule , he added a rule about timely payment

The • If a payment method is stated, you must have the required funds available for that payment method in order to dice. Was always there , thanks . @Biofighter

i changed the rule because of your report but someone changed it back to the old wording afterwards. ex post facto sensibilities apply here, so he's not liable for anything as his repayment time was "timely" enough.

we're discussing the wording we want to use going forwards, but @Excelont's judgement is correct in either case