Really...

[Fruit]

http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=6058198#post6058198

posted for spamming after I gave my offer and then another post for input. This Mod is abusing a little bit of power?

 

[SuF]

You were still attempting to get your deal done. Eh.

 

[Fruit]

I know I was thats what I mean. I was basically saying I'd still do it if he reconsidered. I was going to flame him after his other posts but chose not to due to possibly getting an infraction, yet I get one anyway.

 

Posting again after I clearly stated my price was firm, meaning your offer was not welcome and I did not want it. Spam.

 

He was attempting to justify his offer. Even if you, "don't want it" does not mean it's not allowed. You never specifically told him to stop posting. If his post really bugged you, just ignore it or get a market moderator to delete it.

I'd vote for a reversal. You don't need to infract for these silly things.

 

He was attempting to justify his offer. Even if you, "don't want it" does not mean it's not allowed. You never specifically told him to stop posting. If his post really bugged you, just ignore it or get a market moderator to delete it.

I'd vote for a reversal. You don't need to infract for these silly things.

Stop spamming the thread, I have a firm price.

He continued to argue for a different price after I posted that.

 

He continued to argue for a different price after I posted that.

No... You clearly were directing that comment at Timmy owns, not him. Your only direct response to him was:

That was a good joke.

No.

Calling something a "joke" is more than enough to justify a response. Once again this is a silly, unwarranted infraction. Just reverse it and move on.

 

That was a warning to everyone posting on the thread. That wasn't a clear comment towards Timmy, or I would've said his name and properly directed it at him.

You need to stop looking for loopholes in my justification, as it was warranted and I won't reverse it.

 

[Benwise]

Justified + Warranted.

 

[SuF]

*drama*...

 

That was a warning to everyone posting on the thread. That wasn't a clear comment towards Timmy, or I would've said his name and properly directed it at him.

You need to stop looking for loopholes in my justification, as it was warranted and I won't reverse it.

Don't be so posh; I'm not "looking for loopholes" only trying to justify my view on the situation. Too many moderators overuse infractions (and get our users angry, the same people who keep Sythe.org running) when I believe deleting the post would be more efficient.

Apparently Ben agrees with warranted, so I'll just go ahead and archive this. Try not to take it personally, Farcast.