Infraction Dispute

Hi,

- SuF infracted me.

- I was infracted for the content of this post: ("Accusing of scamming without proof")

The infraction was unwarranted. I was not "Accusing him of scamming without proof" - He had a Trade With Caution at the time I said this. Scammer is a word used to generalize people who aren't Trustworthy, dodgy, or people who have a TWC...etc etc.
This is why Hahanerd45 has the TWC, in his own words:

So I fail to see how I was accusing him of scamming without proof?
All I said was what he had already said. Is the TWC and his own words not enough proof as to why I called him a scammer?

If my infraction stands, you may aswell infract all of these people who made posts like mine in the same thread:

Thanks.

 

If you haven't reported him of scamming, haven't posted evidence and etc etc, you have no proof of his "scamming".

Denied.