- It's hard to PM them when they are rarely on, and other mods have to step in and mod their sections, so yes.
- The SFA sections (and others) don't have the same activity but they have a mod? Justify that?
- The problem is serious problems are being reported but being over looked because the mods can't get to all the reported posts.
1. I do agree it's been hard to get into contact with them while they're "rarely on" and it's unfair if other mods have to step in to take action outside their designated forum but it defeats the purpose of Global Moderators.
2. The SFA section have a more stricter rule policy. It's generally communist (in a way) and you're limited to say your opinion but with reason. It's important that people contribute while giving an answer but not say something that's entirely off-topic and unreasonable. What people say and think are all important and MUST abide by the rules in a more more-so controlled environment. Too many spammed answers, the topic goes off-topic completely and defeats the purpose of a section for "intelligent conversation".
3. Well this has just been an issue lately. We all know. People have been suggesting and posting feedback about this issue several times recently. It hasn't been a problem for a while and it starts to build up now.
