i am java
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 9, 2008
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 231
That's just stupid. No one is going to give you a free ride. Cpu-time and bandwidth cost money. If you are consuming the equivalent of a dedicated server and several terabytes of bw a month, that's going to be costing them at least $200 per month. So why would they retain you on a $12 a month contract? Simple: they wouldn't.
Yahoo! would. My host would. (And it's $20 a month for my host.) How do I know that? I have hosted with them both and when my site was DDoS'ed one day, my host simply moved me from a shared host to a VPS. To this day, I am still on a VPS. I payed no more for the VPS than I did the shared host.
It doesn't matter anyways, like I said, there are always better hosts.
They have big highly distributed CDNs. It doesn't matter if one branch of their network goes down, the load is redistributed onto the other servers. This is possible due to the economy of scale.
110mb, the free host, has the same thing. I don't suppose it would cost too much more to have the same network?


