Do you agree?

[P o ii Z oN]

I do hate the word "Terrorist". Do you know why they are called Terrorists? It's because they are not a country or a state so they cannot "Technically" Declare war on America and the United Kingdom and whoever else they want to fight. If Osama were to Take over a country and become president of it or king whatever he wishes he would be called a "Former terrorist" or not one at all.

So what I'm asking you is, Do you think it's right to call them terrorists? I think they have every right to attack a country. Using a plane to take down a building or anything is nothing new. Japan used planes and drove them into ships in WWII. They were not called terrorists. It's simply a tactic. So yes, they are called terrorists just because they are not a part of a country. So yet again I raise the question.


Do you think it is right. There is no right or wrong answer. Just opinion.

 

[333]

They are called "terrorists" because they terror people?

 

[P o ii Z oN]

It's only called terror because they are not part of a country.. No matter what ANY country did to you.. no matter how much terror they caused they couldn't be called terrorists..


The point of the word terrorist is its just a bunch of people causing terror.. it couldn't be called or considered war because they aren't a country or a state. so that's the only thing left to call them and it's the only thing left that can technically label what they are doing. I just think that word is a bit silly and I wish they would call them something more respectful.. they are fighting for something they believe in.

 

[Wedel]

They'r called terrorists because there is a group of people in south arabia, i'm not sure what its called where they suicide themselfs and suicide others, explode bombs and etc, so i think yeah every killer from iraq, south arabia should be called terrorists, they just look like them.

 

[pie_row]

I think they have every right to attack a country.

What. The. Fuck. No one has/should have the right to kill people. Have you been brainwashed?

Using a plane to take down a building or anything is nothing new. Japan used planes and drove them into ships in WWII.

Yes, In a world wide WAR. there is a huge difference. the japanese soldiers were not terrorists, they were only doing what there leader's was telling them to and the ones that did fly planes into ships where brainwashed.

They should be called terrorists because thats what they are! Maybe you should research a definition of terrorist...

 

[P o ii Z oN]

Brainwashed... LOL. Japanese soldiers were not terrorists BECAUSE THEY WERE A COUNTRY'S SOLDIERS. If those soldiers didn't belong to a country and then drove that plane into a ship they would become a terrorist.

 

[pie_row]

I wish they would call them something more respectful.. they are fighting for something they believe in.

LOL! you're a maggot muslim arent you? They dont deserve respect, Would you respect someone who blew up your parents because he thought he would go to heaven? HOW FUCKING SELFISH!

 

[pie_row]

Brainwashed... LOL. Japanese soldiers were not terrorists BECAUSE THEY WERE A COUNTRY'S SOLDIERS. If those soldiers didn't belong to a country and then drove that plane into a ship they would become a terrorist.

yes... that was the piont i was making.....

 

[P o ii Z oN]

I'm actually atheist... Every single religion has killed people except maybe Hinduism and Budism. If your parents did actually get blown up then I am sorry. They didn't just do it because they think they go to heaven, They did it because them being American, British or anything else that isn't middle eastern a Infadel.. I spelled that wrong lol.

 

[You Lost The Game]

i think their called terrorists because they cause harm and they are not from 1 place, they are all over the place. its not that they dont belong to A country, its because they dont belong to the SAME country.

 

[smvamp]

Brainwashed... LOL. Japanese soldiers were not terrorists BECAUSE THEY WERE A COUNTRY'S SOLDIERS. If those soldiers didn't belong to a country and then drove that plane into a ship they would become a terrorist.

Terrorist are anyone who perform acts of terror. Broad.

Let me tell you, these terrorists flew planes into the Twin Towers when there WASN'T A WAR GOING ON.

See what I am saying? It wasn't a war, it was just random. The situation with the soldiers is completely different. I think what you are refering to is kamikaze fighters. Yes, you can call the terrorist's kamikaze.

 

[The Riddler_]

All terroist can suck my fucking ass. You go boom, then 40 virgins. Who believes that? They're all retarded. If smart, then strategically smart, not smart as in thinking more than short term. And it's a shame that they make they're entire family terrorist also, or they brainwash them.

They are called terrorist because they are trying to fear a certain group of people. If Korea started to use militarism to bully people with they're bombs, then they are terrorists too.

 

[iown1234]

All terroist can suck my fucking ass. You go boom, then 40 virgins. Who believes that? They're all retarded. If smart, then strategically smart, not smart as in thinking more than short term. And it's a shame that they make they're entire family terrorist also, or they brainwash them.

They are called terrorist because they are trying to fear a certain group of people. If Korea started to use militarism to bully people with they're bombs, then they are terrorists too.

If you were smart, you would know that not all terriosts are muslims.

http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/terrorist-groups.cfm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_organizations, a list of all the terriosts groups in the world.

 

[`Zach`]

terrorists is from the work terrorism which means to cause terror.

so; if your a terrorists, obviously, they are intended to cause terror; which makes there name what they are.

 

[The Riddler_]

If you were smart, you would know that not all terriosts are muslims.

http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/terrorist-groups.cfm and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_designated_terrorist_organizations, a list of all the terriosts groupds in the world.

I know, i forgot to mention others. But others do brainwash they're families into thinking the same as them.

 

[DrewDudez]

Terrorists spawn terror with explosive or other unecessary violent tactics. We can't brand them as some other countries doing it so the term terrorist is just a broad term to use on people that threaten our order. Even if they did belong to a certain country out to get us we'd still relate to them as terrorists to some degree.

 

[xx mdv xx]

The terrorists groups or known as Rogue Nations, which are groups of people who have military power but they don't have their own land.

Yes, I agree that they should be called terrorists because that's exactly what they do, they terrorize. The Muslim terrorist groups aren't really trying to conquer nations, they're just there to cause terror the the United States and other coalition nations because of religious belief.

 

[Bouov]

I do hate the word "Terrorist". Do you know why they are called Terrorists? It's because they are not a country or a state so they cannot "Technically" Declare war on America and the United Kingdom and whoever else they want to fight.

Actually, they are called terrorists because they cause and manipulate terror.

So what I'm asking you is, Do you think it's right to call them terrorists?

Of course. They cause terror, therefore they are terrorists. It's not a question of wrong or right, but rather one of wether they are or they aren't.

I think they have every right to attack a country.

Not in America they don't.

Japan used planes and drove them into ships in WWII. They were not called terrorists. It's simply a tactic.

It was also a tactic used by modern terrorist groups. That doesn't change that fact that it's a terrorist act.

Furthermore, you don't need to justify something with a name. If you killed someone and I called you a pig, it doesn't mean that your not a murderer.

 

[Esuom]

The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor is a horrible example. The Japanese attacked American Soldiers, not civilians, at a time of war. Sure, the United States may not have been technically in WWII at the time, but it was a given that they would join.

The difference between a terrorist and a soldier is who they attack. You don't see Japanese pilots flying their planes into our cities, soldiers generally keep their attacks directed toward other military personnel.

 

[Schnell]

The Muslim terrorist groups aren't really trying to conquer nations, they're just there to cause terror the the United States and other coalition nations because of religious belief.

Is that so? The Taliban fights for control of Afghanistan, and IRA fights to free Ireland from the UK, to name a few example.


I know IRA isn't muslim, so feel free to not point that out.