• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

  • *ATTENTION* Threads posted in this section are hidden until approved by a staff member. You can also post as a guest by clicking "Post New Thread." Thank you.

Infraction Dispute

Status
Not open for further replies.

theripcity32

Forum Addict
Joined
Sep 5, 2005
Sythe Gold
0
Messages
395
Age
36
Location
from the Detroit City
The Viper is terribly fucked in the head. The thread goes as follows:

I'm sure you've heard about Mrs. California's "controversial" view on gay marriage.

Really? She's getting shit from everybody, getting called a "bigot," and having her photos spread around like a fucking wildfire. She's entitled to her opinion without being prosecuted for it! This is an example of the liberal media taking things WAY, WAY, WAY too far..

[YOUTUBE]IC6zhQK_J2c[/YOUTUBE]​

Your view?

My response was..

My view? Fuck Perez. Fuck Chris Matthews. Fuck Rachel Maddow. Fuck Keith Olbermann. Fuck them all.

This is a very legitimate response. While it is hostile and negative, it can not be deemed unintelligent because it accurately contributes to the thread by directly answering the question that the creator of the thread asked. Furthermore, if Finniscool, being the administrator that he is, who posted in this very same thread, didn't feel the need to infract me, who's to say this sissy slut whore should?
 
That forum is Something for All. Intelligent discussion only. "Fuck them All" is not intelligent, contrary to what you believe.

And it's funny how you managed to rack up another infraction for flaming on this thread isn't it?

NO, your statement, "'Fuck them All' is not intelligent, contrary to what you believe" is unintelligent, contrary to what you believe. I backed my statement up with logic and reasoning. You, on the other hand, have failed to back up your worthless opinion. I demand you repeal these two infractions or I will have you stripped of your powers. I have spoken.
 
NO, your statement, "'Fuck them All' is not intelligent, contrary to what you believe" is unintelligent, contrary to what you believe. I backed my statement up with logic and reasoning. You, on the other hand, have failed to back up your worthless opinion. I demand you repeal these two infractions or I will have you stripped of your powers. I have spoken.

You really don't get it do you. The infraction was warranted, as the post is "unintelligent". Also, threatening and flaming staff members will get you no where. It will only result in the accumulation of more infractions. You've been infracted on the above post for threatening a staff member.
 
You really don't get it do you. The infraction was warranted, as the post is "unintelligent". Also, threatening and flaming staff members will get you no where. It will only result in the accumulation of more infractions. You've been infracted on the above post for threatening a staff member.

My question is WHY is the post unintelligent? Also, I quote my first post that has yet to be answered..

This is a very legitimate response. While it is hostile and negative, it can not be deemed unintelligent because it accurately contributes to the thread by directly answering the question that the creator of the thread asked. Furthermore, if Finniscool, being the administrator that he is, who posted in this very same thread, didn't feel the need to infract me, who's to say this sissy slut whore should?

Also, how contradictory for you to force me to go by the rules when you, in an attempt to inflict punishment on my acct for breaking a certain rule, don't even respect this very same rule you are punishing me for. Talk about abuse of power.

You really don't get it do you. The infraction was warranted, as the post is "unintelligent". Also, threatening and flaming staff members will get you no where. It will only result in the accumulation of more infractions. You've been infracted on the above post for threatening a staff member.

You are an imbecile beyond belief. Obviously I was jokingly sarcastic in my response when I stated, "I demand you repeal these two infractions or I will have you stripped of your powers. I have spoken.", therefore, I demand you repeal this infraction or I will have you stripped of your powers as well. I have spoken once more.
 
You really don't get it do you. The infraction was warranted, as the post is "unintelligent". Also, threatening and flaming staff members will get you no where. It will only result in the accumulation of more infractions. You've been infracted on the above post for threatening a staff member.

Since when was a title as useless as "Head User Educator" given the authority to infract, let alone allowed to infract out of his/her own section? Bless you Runescape children.
 
Lumpy Space Princess
Le
Pokémon Trainer
Two Factor Authentication User
Since when was a title as useless as "Head User Educator" given the authority to infract, let alone allowed to infract out of his/her own section? Bless you Runescape children.
Uh, excuse me? Head User Educator is in charge of the user education section, and is therefore a moderator.
 
<3 n4n0
Discord Verified
Two Factor Authentication User
Community Participant
Spam Forum Participant
Sythe's 10th Anniversary
Sythe Awards 2011 Winner
The original infraction was indeed justified as it is spam in a debate forum.
 
ALL OF YOU MODERATOR'S KEEP SAYING THE SAME THING. I HAVE OFFERED MY THOUGHTS AS TO WHY IT IS NOT SPAM; YOU HAVE YET TO RESPOND TO MY ARGUMENT. I DEMAND JUSTICE.

Uh, excuse me? Head User Educator is in charge of the user education section, and is therefore a moderator.

Steph was way, way cooler than you.
 
Lumpy Space Princess
Le
Pokémon Trainer
Two Factor Authentication User
ALL OF YOU MODERATOR'S KEEP SAYING THE SAME THING. I HAVE OFFERED MY THOUGHTS AS TO WHY IT IS NOT SPAM; YOU HAVE YET TO RESPOND TO MY ARGUMENT. I DEMAND JUSTICE.



Steph was way, way cooler than you.
I'm not trying to be Steph, so why would you make that comment?
 
I'm not trying to be Steph, so why would you make that comment?

I made the comment because you are a bandwagon hopper like the rest the n0obiez on this forum. Think for yourself and try not to be afraid to break barriers for once? After all, this is just a forum that you slave away for in return for absolutely nothing.

Also, you are a girl. In comparison to Steph, Steph is a cooler girl. While you are not trying to be like Steph, you unintentionally share basic traits with Steph power-wise and physically, therefore causing me to draw comparison between the two of you. Nothing personal; just saying.
 
Lumpy Space Princess
Le
Pokémon Trainer
Two Factor Authentication User
That's just the way you see it. Maybe if you took the time to get to know me, you'd think different. Goodbye for now.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top