Closing threads.

[Deacon Frost]

He should have posted the reason that I have my in example, and he did so it was my "place to question", now stop posting, your discrediting yourself the more you post. Its been over since the Solid's post.

No I am not discrediting myself at all, as I am not trying to propose my point of view, or opinions I have?

I have stated solid facts.

He does not have to answer to you, nor do you really need to get involved in his business.

If he wants to lock a thread, he can do so, that's his right. You can bitch all you want, but he doesn't have to tell you shit.


So back the fuck off, and shut the fuck up.

 

[Triggers Down]

No I am not discrediting myself at all, as I am not trying to propose my point of view, or opinions I have?

Okay, I understand your reasoning

He does not have to answer to you, nor do you really need to get involved in his business.

I never asked him to answer me, but he clarified why he locked the thread at his own will. That thread was worth getting in his business but once he clarified I had no more business so I ended it there, then you started your pointless rant.

If he wants to lock a thread, he can do so, that's his right.

I agree totally, if he has a valid reason.

You can bitch all you want, but he doesn't have to tell you shit.

You are the only one "bitching" here, I am not.

So back the fuck off, and shut the fuck up.

I have been "shutting the fuck up", asking to close thread, your continuing every time for no reason.

 

[Nullware]

That's considered backseat moderating by the way.

This is his own thread genius. Why couldn't he request it to be locked.

 

[Triggers Down]

Well, the situation is already resolved, its not backseat moderating if there is no topic in a thread and posts are still being posted. In addition, I already have Pm'd a mod (probably hasn't been on) there is no reason to have this open.

 

[Nullware]

He can PM a mod to have it locked. Posting stuff like
---thread closed----
is backseat moderating. When it is a sale thread, or something that has to do with trading, I'd agree with you because it directly relates to the thread starter. But when it is a topic discussing something or another, then he is not allowed to close it without a mod's approval.

It's absurd that you think this should be allowed or disallowed based on the content of the thread.

If regular members were allowed to close their own threads, they would be given that permission.

No one was actually talking about closing their own threads, only about giving their opinion that it probably should be. They should be entitled to that opinion as they are the one who felt the thread was justified to be created in the first place.

 

[slashshot007]

Delete the Runescape section for the win.

CHEA!

 

[Noob!]

hes doing a fine job.

 

[Kanoy]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA not funny.

Typical Deacon Frost
You just love to get into arguments and debates don't you?

This whole thread pretty much just turned into an argument between trigger and deacon. I believe this section is the Feedback section for mods/admins to look at and respond. Not a forum where members fight each other verbally.

Just call it a truce and end it.


Can't take criticism?
http://sythe.org/showthread.php?p=3973956#post3973956

Harden the fuck up. (Pun intended)