• Log in or sign up for an account here: https://www.sythe.org/login

Abortion?

I agree with abortion.

If a women is raped, I doubt she would want to keep the baby, The same with a pregnant teen. A friend of mine recently had a baby and she's only 15.

Maybe something will be wrong with the baby when it's born, Extra limbs or something of that nature... Maybe it would be better off dead.
 
Well there's both parts I agree with, and there's part I dissagree with.

If you wait like 2 almost 3 months before doing abortion, it's like killing the baby, and if you don't want the baby, you could always use "adoption" as an alternative.
 
Finniscool said:
Why must a woman be forced to give birth against her will?
Click to expand...

Never said that did I?
I said I agree and dissagree with it.

But sure, let's all kill babies!
(Don't call it a fetus, because it will have a heartbeat!)

But I really do think it's up to the individual themselves, as long as who ever might be the "father" gets informed.
 
i think abortion is fine. i dont see why people make that big of a deal over it. its the parents choice to get rid of it
 
I believe abortion is fine, as long as the contributors know what they are losing. I mean, that baby of yours could have grown up to be the president! But, instead, you chose to have it broken into bits and pieces inside your cervix and sucked through a half-inch-in-diameter plastic tube.....

Meh, women.
 
I'm not pro-abortion. But I'm pro-choice. Often, even though you are preventing life, you are making dozens of lives better and safer.
 
Citrificus said:
I believe abortion is fine, as long as the contributors know what they are losing. I mean, that baby of yours could have grown up to be the president! But, instead, you chose to have it broken into bits and pieces inside your cervix and sucked through a half-inch-in-diameter plastic tube.....

Meh, women.
Click to expand...

The baby could also grow up to be the next Joseph Stalin. Oh, wait: Future possibilities are irrelevant.
 
It is 'legal murder' of a child, technically.

But the day after pill isn't.

I don't approve of nay way of disposing a human, but that's my religion getting in the way.

Without religion, abortion should be legal up until the baby is considered 'living', with the division of church and state.
 
LegitNamesCo said:
I don't approve of nay way of disposing a human, but that's my religion getting in the way.

Without religion, I believe abortion should be legal up until the baby is considered 'living'
Click to expand...


Why do you have that religion if it gets in the way of what you really believe?
 
Pool Shark
Village Drunk
<3 n4n0
Battleship Champion
Sythe's 20th Anniversary
I absolutely DO NOT AGREE with Abortion what-so-ever.

My mom has had 7 children, or has she? No.. she's only had 5.

SHE'S HAD 2, COUNT IT, 2 ABORTIONS!

I hate her so much for this, because she's taken away the lives of two of my siblings.

I wish she had a legitimate reason to back up her reasoning, besides the fact that she "did it" with Ron Jeremy when she was 16 or 17.

Yes, she did do it with Ron Jeremy.. she should've starred in the Porn Film.. I'd be rich instead of poor.

Damn Mother..

~Unb4nn3d
 
Straggler said:
Why do you have that religion if it gets in the way of what you really believe?
Click to expand...

I don't believe that abortion is right. But, I live in America, and since we're talking about murder, or per say, laws.
Then the constitution comes into effect. And there is a division between state, and church.
 
Without religion, I believe abortion should be legal up until the baby is considered 'living'
Click to expand...

Why do you choose the point where the baby is considered "living" as where abortion should be legal? Why not up until when the baby is considered a "person"?
 
The Fat Controller said:
Why do you choose the point where the baby is considered "living" as where abortion should be legal? Why not up until when the baby is considered a "person"?
Click to expand...

Because killing a living human is murder.

Killing a human that's not living isn't.

Therefor it's not 'illegal'.
 
well the baby is living inside. it may not be fully developed but it does have a heart beating... if thats not living then i dont what is.. but i still think its fine to have abortions
 
LegitNamesCo said:
Because killing a living human is murder.

Killing a human that's not living isn't.

Therefor it's not 'illegal'.
Click to expand...

Well the issue at hand, to build on what The Fat Controller said, is that living tissue is not inherently deserving of rights. Imagine a chunk of human intestine grown in a Petri dish - would that deserve rights?
 
Shredderbeam said:
Well the issue at hand, to build on what The Fat Controller said, is that living tissue is not inherently deserving of rights. Imagine a chunk of human intestine grown in a Petri dish - would that deserve rights?
Click to expand...


To be fair, Shredderbeam, this intestine will never have a chance to be a living human, whereas an embrio will.
 
i love drugs said:
To be fair, Shredderbeam, this intestine will never have a chance to be a living human, whereas an embrio will.
Click to expand...

But that chunk of intenstine has roughly the same amount of humanity as a fetus, up to a certain stage of that fetus's development.

Why attach any significance to potential? There's always the potential for a baby, even if the women hasn't got pregnant yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Runescape Gamblingrunescape gambling
Back
Top