Resolved.

Link to Current Sythe:
@Probemas @MyPvM
Violation Reporting for:
Possible Market Manipulation:
Why you think they’re violating sythe rules:
Link to initial report
Probemas boosting service - unbalanced decision

Concerns in Question:
imgur.com

When @Jinz0 agreed to the following TOS, was it Probemas or MyPVM tos that he was agreeing too?
I think that will have a very influential response to his RAS post.

When he applied for MyPVM, and they decided to “transfer” him to Probemas, was this something he anticipated when applying for MyPVM? Did he feel obligated to accept the transfer to Probemas after paying the deposit? Or did he know about it before? Was he possible coerced?

Do we have two reputable & influential service providers in the Sythe.org market, double dipping by “transferring/sharing” workers, jobs, bots or whatever else to gain advantage of the market?

Is the supposed “contract” between Probemas and MyPVM going to be overlooked to see if they are not trying to take advantage of the market?

If MyPVM is so close with Probemas, are we able to confirm that when both companies are bumping Gold Selling threads (and possible other threads), that either/or are not referring one another to the other person to gain profit?

Are we able to confirm that each individual service sold is not being outsourced to one-another?

I think the public would be very interested to know about said “contract” between the two parties if there is one. It could be a make or break type of situation between many customers in the market.

 

[PvM Services Niki]

MyPvM, known for offering provably the safest services, and Probemas, a seasoned veteran of the community, are honored to address these unfounded accusations.

Given that this report originated from a personal motive, I find it fitting to respond on a personal note as well:
Following the achievement of your husband, who reached 200 million XP in each melee skill by treating you as merely a means for training, we are delighted to share that through the stringent safety standards upheld by Probemas and MyPvM, we have successfully revived what was once considered lost. We brought her back from the brink, breathing life into her once again.


Q: When he applied for MyPVM, and they decided to “transfer” him to Probemas, was this something he anticipated when applying for MyPVM? Did he feel obligated to accept the transfer to Probemas after paying the deposit? Or did he know about it before? Was he possible coerced?
A: Indeed, he was aware and participated willingly. He always had the opportunity to opt out but chose to stay, a testament to the positive work environment we've created. Moreover, it's worth noting that he himself has raised no objections regarding this matter, a point you seem to have overlooked.

-

Q: Do we have two reputable & influential service providers in the Sythe.org market, double dipping by “transferring/sharing” workers, jobs, bots or whatever else to gain advantage of the market?
A: We do not engage any practice to gain advantage of the market.

-

Q: Is the supposed “contract” between Probemas and MyPVM going to be overlooked to see if they are not trying to take advantage of the market?
A: First: Not for the public. Second: We do not take any advantage.

-

Q: If MyPVM is so close with Probemas, are we able to confirm that when both companies are bumping Gold Selling threads (and possible other threads), that either/or are not referring one another to the other person to gain profit?
A: In such scenarios, we enforce strict regulations to ensure compliance and integrity.

-

Q: Are we able to confirm that each individual service sold is not being outsourced to one-another?
A: Indeed, they are distinct entities. Our workers are bound to exclusivity unless explicit permission is granted, in accordance with our terms of service for employees.



Q: I think the public would be very interested to know about said “contract” between the two parties if there is one. It could be a make or break type of situation between many customers in the market.
A: Public interest is welcome in matters that are public. However, private agreements are respected as confidential.

-

I would have been amused to see your expression as you searched through all the services, only to end in disappointment. It should have become apparent to your pea brain then that the esteemed enterprises of Probemas and MyPvM have always adhered to, currently adhere to, and will continue to adhere to, the principles of fair play in the market, never compromising ethical standards for personal advantage.

 

Q: Is the supposed “contract” between Probemas and MyPVM going to be overlooked to see if they are not trying to take advantage of the market?
A: First: Not for the public. Second: We do not take any advantage.

Please share this with the staff team with the following guidelines: Do not make edit history/private reports (I advise using the post report feature).

Please also explain your relationship with @Probemas , I'm particularly interested in what services you provide to @Probemas example: outsourcing accounts, training accounts, gold sales, etc. If this does not contain sensitive information or is not under a legally binding NDA it will have to be posted publicly

 

[PvM Services Niki]

Our collaboration is exclusively focused on account training and includes an agreement to be fully compatible with forum rules. Further details of the agreement can be found in the reported post.

 

There is a deleted post above for staff to see with all the information we required,

@Probemas @MyPvM are not conducting market manipulation as businesses are not interlinked in any section which both parties are bumping in.