[Resolved]

[Jibby Jibby]

User: Arka | Sell & Trade Game Items | OSRS Gold | ELO (sythe.org)

Arka is not mentioning that he is not the original owner of the max main he is selling. He did this on purpose because the original owner is DNT.

He wants to sell it fast because of that lol.

Account thread:
[$200 DONOR]Selling 2277 Maxed main account, Inferno, 12 pets and many untradeables. | Sell & Trade Game Items | OSRS Gold | ELO (sythe.org)

Same account 3 years ago where he mentions ugly god is the OO, who also confirms it there:
[200$ Donator ]Selling almost maxed totall main,lots of untradeable; 13x99 and inferno. | Sell & Trade Game Items | OSRS Gold | ELO (sythe.org)

 

[President]

@Arka

Are you the OO of that account, and if not:

why don't you mention in the new thread that you are not the OO of the account?

 

@Arka

Are you the OO of that account, and if not:

why don't you mention in the new thread that you are not the OO of the account?

I am not the OO of the account, my bad i didn't know that it was mandatory to say in the thread, didn't have any plans to scam or anything.

Should i mention it in thread or is it a problem since OO is DNT ? In that case i will remove the thread.

 

[President]

I am not the OO of the account, my bad i didn't know that it was mandatory to say in the thread, didn't have any plans to scam or anything.

Should i mention it in thread or is it a problem since OO is DNT ? In that case i will remove the thread.

[Section Rules] Old School RuneScape Accounts

"3. you must clearly state if you are the original owner or not before trading. Users are free to ask who the original owner is before trading."

Per the rules, you don't necessarily need to mention it in the thread, as long as you know that it is your responsibility to disclose to the buyer that you are not the original owner.

Having said that, I hope that you understand that this situation does raise some eyebrows and I do understand where the report is coming from, given that both threads refer to the same account. In a previous thread you explicitly mention that you are not the OO, now the OO is market-banned, and consequently you create a new thread in which you don't mention that you are not the OO - in contrast to the previous thread.

 

[Section Rules] Old School RuneScape Accounts

"3. you must clearly state if you are the original owner or not before trading. Users are free to ask who the original owner is before trading."

Per the rules, you don't necessarily need to mention it in the thread, as long as you know that it is your responsibility to disclose to the buyer that you are not the original owner.

Having said that, I hope that you understand that this situation does raise some eyebrows and I do understand where the report is coming from, given that both threads refer to the same account. In a previous thread you explicitly mention that you are not the OO, now the OO is market-banned, and consequently you create a new thread in which you don't mention that you are not the OO - in contrast to the previous thread.

Yeah, I totally understand that the situation could sound sketchy but that wasn't my plan at all.
So is it fine put a link to OO even if he has DNT ?

 

[President]

Yeah, I totally understand that the situation could sound sketchy but that wasn't my plan at all.
So is it fine put a link to OO even if he has DNT ?

Sure, that's up to you

I'll close this report, thank you for responding so swiftly @Arka and thank you for the report @Jibby Jibby