resolved

@Elysiangp
@Ghoma
@Aloe

I understand wanting to expand and wanting to make money, but market manipulation upon more market manipulation... Rules apply to all.

[$420 Donor] - $99 per cape - 2400+ Infernal capes completed - Most impressive clicks in the world
Ghoma's Infernal Cape Service Remote GP/BTC/Crypto/PayPal Safe ️ 200$ Donor ️
Aloe's Inferno Service 500+ Completed Capes ️️ PayPal & Tikkie ️‍ Any Acc Parsec

- as you can see still being actively bumped

If i'm right, we are not allowed to work for other services whilst actively bumping our own threads.

@Dzeny doesn't even actually do services, he just runs threads to sponsor for @Baod

$300 DONOR DZENY OSRS INFERNAL SERVICE

- Just including since i'm only going in on inferno capes atm, but you can just as easily find

$1,000 Donator️1,500+ Feedback️Pures - Hcims & Irons️ 0 Bans!Remotely connectedPrice drop!
[$1000 donor] [ 1000+ Vouches ] VirtGold Global Infernal cape Zerk/Pure/IM [Budget Gear] PRICE BEAT
$777 Donor 1000+ Vouches We BEAT QUOTES!Infernal + 6 Jads [EU/US/AUS]0% BAN RATEALL Builds
Aloe's Inferno Service 500+ Completed Capes ️️ PayPal & Tikkie ️‍ Any Acc Parsec
[CHEAP INFERNO CAPE SERVICES] [300$+ DONOR] [PRICE MATCHING] [220+ VOUCHES]

 

This is just a few more to show exposure of bullshit.

More to come.

 

I would like to follow up with the help from @ChellBell as it is obvious there is no specific ruling on it, or at least it seems not. If there is then it needs to be updated and not lost in the shuffle of market problems where we know what stuff we can do and cant

You can see here, @Techie clearly states that if multiple services are using the same one and they are all actively accessing their threads (you would assume the guy themselves also in such cases let's say Aloe) it would be locked etc.

- The reasoning for this would be due to market manipulation from what I understand, if tech would like to confirm.

And then we have @Gladiator saying the complete opposite which is quite a different stance. I get that mods can decide on it on how they "feel on that given day" but there does need to be a more clear stance to lead by example. I do feel if this is the case, this could bring up a suggestion thread to try clarify more

 

From what I understand you can do infernal capes for multiple threads as long as you don't handle the ticket/take payment.

 

From what I understand you can do infernal capes for multiple threads as long as you don't handle the ticket/take payment.

It's very possible, however I'd like to point out the first part of Andy response and also my post above yours. There needs to be a much clearer stance to avoid this sort of thread moving forward

 

Is there any proof of them taking payments or handling the tickets?

 

Is there any proof of them taking payments or handling the tickets?

I haven't dug through every persons discord ticket systems, simply put because there wouldn't be a need for such. If there is nothing wrong with the current status of how things operate I do feel that there needs to be better understanding/updated ruling if so.

 

Unless there is proof of them handling tickets and whatnot, there is nothing more we can do.