[Resolved]

John Devola · Dec 4, 2018

Scammer's profile link: @Pain
Explanation of the trade: Advertising @R2Pleasent is a backer of AccKings.com when he is not

After @Pain's report on which he flexed @R2Pleasent in every post, people needed more information on how R2 joined forces with autism.

They asked him questions, sent paparazzi to his house, and investigated that they could possibly be the same person using a combination of inactive middlemen and toastwallets.

Then we saw this.

Its possible @R2Pleasent was ashamed to be labeled as a Co-Owner, but lets be honest, we are talking about @Pain. What started to becoming apparent is that Bus369 / Divine / @Pain was overselling @R2Pleasent's role in the project for his own benefit. He did so in a way that mods and admins even assumed he was flexing his co-owner..... and not his employee.....

Now lets get into the meat of this bulgogi.

Lets take a look at all of @Pain's posts about AccKings.com

?????????????????????????????????? Why is R2P listed as a "backer"?

Backed is the word of question here.

@R2Pleasent is not an owner, he is merely an employee. Ipso facto he is not paying for AccKings.com, he is not guaranteeing AccKings.com, and he is not a patron of AccKings.com.

Therefore, @R2Pleasent is not a backer of AccKings.com and should therefore @Pain must change all his media to reflect this.

Can we get @Pain to change his banner that is still running on the bottom of this site as well? Thanks!

For @Pain to get "off the hook". @R2Pleasent must provide that he a guarantor of AccKings.com and that he is liable for any scam on the site that - as is @Pain. He must show that this has been in effect since these threads were posted and these graphics were made.

Thank you.

Response to John · Dec 4, 2018

R2's post was in spam forum. I have nothing else to say on the matter. Your treating his post in SF as truth when it's SF. We are not required to validate any claims made the spam forum nor are we required to invalidate them. Perhaps he owns a significant chunk of the website? Perhaps he owns nothing? Perhaps his post is truth? Perhaps he pays me and owns it all? The fact is his post is SF and thus this report is invalid.

Also banners dont have traditional sythe rules applied.

So politely go fuck yourself

.

John Devola · Dec 4, 2018

Why couldn't you post on the actual report?

Oh wait sorry I forgot you were perm banned and your DNT denied. Sorry about that.

Sorry that I am asking you to provide proof of your claims that R2Pleasent is "on the hook" for the site as you claim. This must terribly inconvenience you as you run your billion dollar empire.

Thats alright, now we will get some clarification.

It has been brought to moderators attention that you are making grandiose claims about your website that are either untrue or unproven. Now that there is a legitimate gripe against your claims in the form of R2Pleasent posting - you will be asked for evidence. It being in the spam form has really no basis on this case. It is not used as proof that you are lying, but rather as enough evidence to cast doubt that you may be. (and taken in context of your other retarded statements, it would not be surprising)

A moderator is going to ask you if R2Pleasent is actually backing AccKings.com as you claim. If you say yes that he is a guarantor of the site, and you can prove he has been since you have started it then the report will be closed and we will know you have provided evidence to the contrary. Or @R2Pleasent can provide this testimony on your behalf - of course if he is caught lying for you, then I'll be reporting him as well.

If not. Your posts will be removed and I will be following up with every site out there on which you post.

Think of your report as a "request for inquiry". Rather than an actual case against you. I have proven that there is enough doubt cast, I hope, to have a moderator ask you to provide evidence that R2Pleasent has backed your site since inception.

Hi p2 · Dec 4, 2018

That inquiry your referring to is based on a SF post. Companies are not required to reveal their ownership there is a thing called silent partnerships. I reiterate my stance our company won't be revealing it's ownership structure based on a obscure spam forum post. That is why it's called SPAM forum. That is also why R2 is able to repost the companys threads to advertise because the company and it's other owners are not tied to my personal offences. The company itself has a clean slate. We are bound by non disclosure agreements not to reveal terms of contract and I reiterate no inquiry will be answered in any form based on a SF post. A contract far Trump's that. If staff feel that it should be(which they shouldn't) add it to my list of offences to pardon.

John Devola · Dec 4, 2018

Good. And when they do I am going to powerbot and all the other sites that have AccKings.com posted with this "scam partnership" with R2Pleasent.com backing it and making sure every post is removed.

Will do the same on osbot, but their whole site is a scam rofl so you never know with that one.