[Resolved]

[C0ngs is a botter EXPOSED]

Reporting c0ngs as his services were botted and at least 2 of his victims need to be refunded (if there are more please come forward). The two who are 100% entitled to a refund are @Bhawks and @YoungestPlayer, the latter is now banned.

Brief explanation: I ordered some NMZ from c0ngs on an account I purchased, a week or so into the service the account was perm banned. c0ngs immediately contacted me informing me the account was disabled and requested I recover the account to quash the ban.
Screenshot - 3043b97a56d95d16e4ff4050c6fda078 - Gyazo

At the time of ban, c0ngs had two active reports against him for botting which were both dismissed, early May 2017. Can be found here
Congs max training and here
[resolved]

In regards to my account he refunded me the service and the value of the account + the RSN on it, in return I be quiet and not say a word (As 3 reports in a week for macroing would suggest he infact did bot and he would have been made to pay out the others too)

Evidence of refund issued can be found here:
Screenshot - a4a661b27ae4fecb4f01c6eaf6dd8cfa - Gyazo
Screenshot - 092cf414d4f85f5026ca8517982085d1 - Gyazo
Screenshot - d94d4cd3cbb059500aea156a94ad22ea - Gyazo

Other relevant evidence: Who is BangMC? C0ngs admitting he is at fault and has found some errors in his so called 'workers'
Screenshot - 1ac5164971b848c89b64be7c753c3e3c - Gyazo


Who would ever pay for a service and then bot themselves to receive a ban? Pretty stupid right?

Yes he has screenshots to prove he uses a legit client. I queried him on how he had screenshots of my accounts being levelled but yet my account got disabled, here is his reply:
Screenshot - 60cff3f6446cc115ea93aa999de128af - Gyazo (so this is how he provided all screenshots for the two other cases which were dismissed, please note this itself should warrant a refund for the two victims)

I know I should have reported c0ngs at the time, but I wanted to have my issue solved amicably so that he didnt scam quit and not refund me. Now I have 0 affiliation with the c0ngs AKA the pro botter, it is only right the two victims, who were banned in the same week, be refunded for the total of the service + the account. Any other victims should come forward.

c0ngs deserves a TWC/Ban for: A) Not refunding the 2 victims, knowingly he botted. (3 BANS IN A WEEK?)
B) Advertising as hand done services when in-fact services were botted.
C) Misleading staff in the other reports


Since these incidents C0ngs has stopped his 'hand done' NMZ and is no longer offering such services. Why? His paid scripts have been caught out and he can no longer bot and make GP!


I hope the appropriate actions are taken to insure all victims are offered compensation.

 

Hey mercedes (pretty sure this is you), still salty about that "staking scam"? I see

If any mod needs anything pm me on discord! c0ngs#3825

Also curious as to why you're bringing this up now instead of at the time?
I've always had full transparancy towards my customers so McBang was (IIRC) aware of the situation.

In regards to my account he refunded me the service and the value of the account + the RSN on it, in return I be quiet and not say a word (As 3 reports in a week for macroing would suggest he infact did bot and he would have been made to pay out the others too)

Only reason I refunded you was because I trusted you as a customer since we had done business in the past and talked a lot during those times. If I paid you to keep quiet you would've posted proof of me explicitly stating that.

Other relevant evidence: Who is BangMC? C0ngs admitting he is at fault and has found some errors in his so called 'workers'
Screenshot - 1ac5164971b848c89b64be7c753c3e3c - Gyazo

Nowhere do I admit my workers are at fault, I make assumptions based on logical conclusions.
I also do still believe that the reports were handled correctly according to @Azie 's comment

Yes he has screenshots to prove he uses a legit client. I queried him on how he had screenshots of my accounts being levelled but yet my account got disabled, here is his reply:
Screenshot - 60cff3f6446cc115ea93aa999de128af - Gyazo

Again, note that I'm making logical conclusions based on using my braincells.

I know I should have reported c0ngs at the time, but I wanted to have my issue solved amicably so that he didnt scam quit and not refund me. Now I have 0 affiliation with the c0ngs AKA the pro botter, it is only right the two victims, who were banned in the same week, be refunded for the total of the service + the account. Any other victims should come forward.

So, logically speaking you'd be reporting me straight after the refund happened?

Since these incidents C0ngs has stopped his 'hand done' NMZ and is no longer offering such services. Why? His paid scripts have been caught out and he can no longer bot and make GP!

Actually I had retakes and decided to take school serious, but hey, to each their own, not everyone is a filthy scammer like you <3
^ can be backed up by the fact that I don't offer any other services, ranging from questing, nmz, fire capes, zulrah's, other skills, renting, gp trading

In addition to this, we offered more services till the end of August if I'm not mistaken.


Last edit;

Add to this:
Reason for not reporting then: Screenshot - 95e19a3b972b8c99dbf0f430a75d6be0 - Gyazo

^ this is me telling you not to report me? no, this is you telling me you won't report me even though I've already made it abundantly clear I'd be refunding you, which I did.

The only reason you're reporting me now is so I don't have the chatlogs with you anymore. But that's fine<3

Screenshot - be51f28421107b8cf18763586b852552 - Gyazo: the expression of heart shows you are grateful im not reporting you ey. I <3 you too!

The expression of heart means that I appreciate that we could handle this through skype.
Again nowhere do I state that you shouldn't report me etc.

as for that last gyazo, I already clarified that but I guess reading is something you never learned.

 

[C0ngs is a botter EXPOSED]

Add to this:
C0ngs is a botter - exposed - claim your refunds now!

Reason for not reporting then: Screenshot - 95e19a3b972b8c99dbf0f430a75d6be0 - Gyazo

Also felt bad for you as you'd have been made to pay out the other 2! No more replies from me. Ciao, just make sure the 2 get refunded.

Dont be salty I am reporting you, its only right your actions be accounted for.

 

[C0ngs is a botter]

Please merge:
C0ngs is a botter - exposed - claim your refunds now!

Hey c0ngs dont defend yourself too hard!!

Screenshot - be51f28421107b8cf18763586b852552 - Gyazo: the expression of heart shows you are grateful im not reporting you ey. I <3 you too!

Oh yeh, so 3 bans in 1 week. You clearly stating one of your workers was to fault, and oh how do you have levelling screenies? Screenshot - 60cff3f6446cc115ea93aa999de128af - Gyazo (GHOST MOUSE? OH RIGHT NICE)

 

[Rswap]

bans does happen on even normal account training as jagex is well aware that there are many powerlvling companies out there. I tried to explain these to mods on sythe

its rare but it does happen users like cong who have completed 100 plus orders there vouches should be enough for this proof that they are not botting

 

although I appreciate the sentiment I felt like I should clarify a few things; (not trying to be rude just my point of view)

bans does happen on even normal account training as Jagex is well aware that there are many powerlvling companies out there. I tried to explain these to mods on sythe

Please note that I'm also aware @Mootrucks made a similar statement

This statement is (in my opinion) false, the basis for this is that "power leveling" is just another for of account sharing, which is discouraged but not a bannable offense. The only time it becomes a bannable offense is when it's used for competitive reasons. (AKA sharing accounts to become rank #2, cuz lynx will always be #1, KEK).

Though I don't think it's as black and white as I'm portraying it, it's more of a grey area, so who knows

users like c0ngs who have completed 100 plus orders there vouches should be enough for this proof that they are not botting

^ should never be accepted as proof for anything, vouches are meaningless in the grand scheme of things. 700ish vouches don't prove that a bot wasn't used, it just makes it less likely, but still, very easily plausible. (considering it takes about a download & a double click).


Again, not trying to be rude, just my POV

 

[video]

You resolved this between yourselves when it first occurred so you can't just decide you want to open up a report 10 months later. The other reports you linked were also resolved and will not be reopened/overturned because of your claims here