I am baked ban

hey mods,

I'd like to explain a few things as to why i made new accounts to browse the forums etc.

I like the forums, never had any problems with it and got into a weird situation. My situation was handled and you've issued a ban. Fair enough there was more evidence against me than i had to prove otherwise.

However, i see that in many cases the same thing isn't handled in the same way due to the lack of evidence. For instance in this report : Rordarok osrs Account Scam
When even i could find out he was banned on previous accs such as skeezus nibor and more.

I get that it is hard to decide what to do in those cases where there is inconclusive evidence. But it is not really consistent.

Another example, there have been a few accusations and one valid report against hannestm, when you just look at his vouches you see that the first is on his ip audit and the rest from flipping gold.

I am not saying mods are bad or whatever, because i respect you guys (especially wortel because he is a boss) but the ruling isn't always consistent.

This isn't about me because i don't expect to be unbanned on i am baked, i still like to browse the forums from time to time. But if my ban is final then it is.

Peace

 

[READ BEFORE REQUESTING A PARDON] Rules to avoid thread being locked or auto-denied.