TWC Dispute - TAESC

Link to/reason for TWC:
I was not using the Sythe Safe PM procedure to cross-confirm confirm Skype identity with Sythe.
TAESC bad pms

List of vouches since receiving TWC:
5 Completed 1-31 Prayer Fire Capes Pictures since the TWC date (03/10/2017), all with transaction values of minimum 50M up to a maximum of 75M. In all cases the customer went first, and obviously in all cases I was trusted with control of each account for extended periods of time.

In addition, all of those fire capes, and several before it have the JAD waves recorded if further confirmation is needed.

In addition:

Reasoning/explanation for sketchy behaviour leading to TWC:
I simply didn't know there existed a standardised PM procedure (I still take issue with this, since it isn't at all obvious to sellers who do not browse the ban/dispute forum that they must be using a set PM/Skype format - this really needs to be made clearer to sellers).

Anything else you wish to say:
If Mods wish, I can give numerous examples since the infarction of me using the correct procedure (there isn't a single instance of using my previous random number system since the infarction date - I have learned my lesson).

These can be shown via a vid/photo or whichever.

I asked for advice on this and currently heeding form the support forum:
What is the Safe PM procedure? (irrate paragraph inside)


Thanks.

TAESC

 

TWC was issued on Oct 3, 2017 - feel free to dispute again on Nov 3, 2017. Closing this.