Why would it be true? What evidence do you have to support such an idea?
Life After Death?
- Thread starter I Iced I
- Start date
Why would it be true? What evidence do you have to support such an idea?
Personal Jesus
Apprentice
And if an innocent man is found guilty of murder, and is murdered in return?
E
eey0re666
Guest
nobody knows, the end.
0120012345
Grand Master
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 5
- Messages
- 2,020
you cant be alive after your dead
yes we can still live.there if another life after death.we will live eternally
Dream on.
Nothing is to hard to understand for the human brain that why people alwace believe that there must be something after this life.
Just think about what was before you were born? you can say that there was nothing before it but your brains won't allow you to think this way it works the same with dieing.
S
Spinner
Guest
although im atheist, i do belive that we reincarnate but not as i am now, completely different with everything that i think feel do ect. i dont belive im going to be a cat with a human mind or anything like that lol.
I Am A Christian I Will Say No More Dont Want To Get Into A Big Arugement
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 506
You know what lets sacrafice someone, and then we reicarnate him and ask him! Oo
You can only see that after you have died..
I
Iwebia
Guest
Notice something? Atheist don't have answers to their questions. They ONLY have questions, the first thing which came out the devils mouth was a question.
Silly little atheist fear what they don't understand. Look up VenomFangX on youtube he'll rip you atheist apart http://www.youtube.com/user/VenomFangX
Silly little atheist fear what they don't understand. Look up VenomFangX on youtube he'll rip you atheist apart http://www.youtube.com/user/VenomFangX
♬♩ Young Forever ♪ ♫
I dont believe in Re-incarnation, but i thought about that one.
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
- Sythe Gold
- 0
- Messages
- 3,361
Â
§~Neo~§
Guest
Im not sure what to think, but my 12-year old cousin died about a year ago and his parents went to see this lady that could communicate with people that have passed on. They were allowed to make a recording of the session and I got to listen to it with other relatives. The lady knew many things that only my cousin could have known and told her. The whole thing made the afterlife sound like when you die, your soul stays on earth (like a ghost), because when he passed on, other relatives and people he knew that had died (like our grandpa) was there to see him.
It really changed my outlook on the afterlife and what happens when you die.
It really changed my outlook on the afterlife and what happens when you die.
Any one of these ideas could be true, or even a combination of some or all of them. There is no way to know for sure what happens after you die. My thoughts are to just forget about it and concentrate on making the most out of the time that you know you have.
Haha, we actually do have answers.
I looked up Venom, and his arguments, while well thought out, were far from perfect. He reached the conclusion that without time, there can be no matter, when we (as good as) know that this is not true inside a black hole. Space-time becomes so warped that time itself progresses no further.
He also decided that whatever created the universe was intelligent, which is erroneous. First of all, highly complex systems can arise from simple rules. Ever see a termite nest? There's an example for you. Second, life persists of its own accord. If conditions on Earth were different, life would have adapted.
Some people don't believe in God because it makes them accountable to their creator? What nonsense is this? Am I necessary evil because I don't believe in a God? His logic is pitiful.
Say I believe in Santa Claus. You say "he's just a children's tale". I counter with "I have faith in him". Perhaps you bring up the argument that you can search the North Pole, and you'll never find him. I can say that Santa, as a being beyond mortals, can evade human detection. Now, if you have any sort of intelligence, you surely know that I am in the wrong. You may not be able to convince me, but it is a fact: I am in the wrong.
Say the same situation applies, except that I believe that I am God. I can answer all of your questions with vague, circular-logic type answers of my own, but surely, you know I am wrong.
Now, this same situation applies to all other religions. Have you ever noticed that religious people never look at ALL of the evidence, and form an unbiased conclusion based upon it? No, they always decide that God exists (almost always because they have been raised to believe it), then look for any evidence, no matter how obscure, to defend that faith.
I advise you all to look at www.godisimaginary.com. It offers 10 reasonable questions that every educated Christian should be able to answer, and 50 logical debunkings of various aspects of religion.
I
Iwebia
Guest
Um.... Still don't disprove God
Silly.
By the way there was a man named Santa Claus, he gave toys to poor children then people made a tail about him.
Even down to the "simplest" cell, theres no way this could have happened by chance. And for someone to think so....never mind.
Silly.
By the way there was a man named Santa Claus, he gave toys to poor children then people made a tail about him.
Even down to the "simplest" cell, theres no way this could have happened by chance. And for someone to think so....never mind.
Personal Jesus
Apprentice
It's impossible to disprove God entirely. Because, imagination is physically unreachable. However, by dissecting small chunks of evidence and logic, you can easily reach the conclusion that God is imaginary.Um.... Still don't disprove God
A few decades ago, the Coca-Cola company created the image of Santa Claus, with the red outfit, cane and all. It's probably the most successful advertisement stunts so far.Iwebia said:
A proper argument in your case would be that of Fred Hoyle's, something about that evolution would have just as much accuracy as if a hurricane hitting a scrapyard would construct a Boeing 717.Iwebia said:
This isn't the case though, because natural selection actually occurs very frequently.
Natural selection is a process in which favorable traits that are heritable become more common in successive generations of a population of reproducing organisms, and unfavorable traits that are heritable become less common. Natural selection acts on the genes, environment, or the observable characteristics of an organism, such that individuals with favorable phenotypes are more likely to survive and reproduce than those with less favorable phenotypes. If these phenotypes have a genetic basis, then the genotype associated with the favorable phenotype will increase in frequency in the next generation. Over time, this process can result in adaptations that specialize organisms for particular ecological niches and may eventually result in the emergence of new species.
Also: thanks to TalkOrigins.org for helping me elaborate.
Similar threads
