But it isn't your still not thinking a rational way and do not deserve to think for youself.
I think it's perfectly rational. I choose what I do with my own body. It's as simple as that.
jaamal said:
Name one that is involuntary besides rape?
That would be a pretty major one.
jaamal said:
Well no man will probably ever know the emotion that a woman goes through during birth, so if I was a woman that gave birth to a child that was a result of a rape my opinion would be valued more, NO so that is irrelevant.
It actually is relevant. It's a woman's body, you know, not a man's.
jaamal said:
The court room can also take away the people's privacy when they consider them a threat to life.
They can, but precedence shows that people have a right to abort something growing in their body.
jaamal said:
So whats the differnce to your brain dead friend then a baby that will become active?
There really isn't a difference. If my friend is truly brain dead, then there's no point in keeping him or her alive.
eXact said:
Namely? If there are any others except for consensual and not consensual i'd like to know. Also, ur trying to use emotional blackmail to dismiss my point- no i dont know what a women feels, yet do you knwo how it would feel to actual kill a human being? Answer im guessing is no- so i guess we're both shooting our "patriarchal mouths"
You really only listed consensual ways, completely ignoring the non-consensual, as if to make it seem that it's the woman's fault all the time.
My girlfriend and I were considering having an abortion about a year ago. We made the decision not to have one, but I'd still say that that comes fairly close to having a realistic idea of what it means to kill.
eXact said:
In referal to "free from oppression" i've said it before and i'll say it again, we DO NOT live in a completely free society. As much as you would like to believe it, we do not have the right to do whatever pleases us. A marriage is considered personal, so if the husband beats the wife, society interferes. Your issue is that you do not see the unborn child as human.
We try to find the balance. Obviously, complete freedom would make us miserable. Are we entitled to it? Yes, but society has chosen not to accept it.
Abortion destroys a potential life, while spousal abuse injures a fully sentient person. I can see your point, but there is a bit of a difference.
Actually, my issue is that I don't believe that a woman should, once pregnant, be forced to carry out the child to term. A matter as personal as that should be left to the discretions of the woman, and possibly, her partner. You'll find that the courts have agreed with me.
the_wippit said:
how can u say that it doesnt have the capacity for consciousness when it becomes conscious in 3 months????????? and yes it does have the same value of human life becuase it is becoming human life! alright when u were only a small lump of cells (as you say) no worth, what if u were aborted? ur mother would have destroyed all that u could have been? how do u justify that? when instead u can just put a baby up for adoption, it even costs less!!!
It will gain the capacity for consciousness, but it doesn't have it yet.
It has the EXACT SAME VALUE? So, in a case where one must live, and the other must die, whom would you choose? The mother, or the fetus?
What if I was? Then I never would have existed, and I wouldn't care.
You can't always put a baby up for adoption, you know. Even if you could, that's not the issue. It's just the idea that the government can force somebody to complete their pregnancy.