Blade

@Blade

I disagree with this post

 

uh i think it's the other way around. everyone who didn't do shit left (besides my boi dunworry)

 

@Do Not Trade

 

Anyone who agrees with the implementation of DNT is a fucking moron; I can't put it any simpler.

Therefore, it's easiest for me to judge the group who left and the group who decided to retain their position by the typical performance of the groups as a whole instead of per individual. While some good members stayed and some shit left, overall they made their point. Idiotic shit is happening on the site and the members who have always stood by and assured that implementations were beneficial to the fruition and furthering of the site's scope and values have been cast aside and ignored by those who are meant to be their superiors, and to guide them in making correct decisions.

 

you're 2hi right now m9

 

why the fuck are you using this account ghast

 

am 2sober almost outta flower

 

On a serious note. I'm sure it'd be easier to note down bans in future (unlikely story) and stick them somewhere so it's easier, link them to said profile etc etc..


can't be that hard.

 

Are you mirin my hacking skills?

 

someone had the balls to say it

heh

 

Can't be because it's not.

 

what's wrong with using Kiro. was it the shitty name change you're just now regretting?

 

Nothing. Realistically, could've reverted the name back if I really wanted to. This goes along with me not giving a shit.

 

im asian tho

 

woah nelly lets not generalize here. Some DNT is good and some are not. Just because some staff have remained on board doesnt mean we automatically agree with 100% of what has happened

 

No, it's not "some dnt are good some aren't," it's that people who were unbanned and given dnt for dumbass drama who shouldn't have been banned in the first place (s/o shrimpy [ek]) are good, while the ones we unbanned with fucking $2k in outstanding scams are not good. fairly simple tbh.

 

So your saying DNT shouldnt have been implemented even though it helped get some unbans for lesser offenses from years ago

 

Correct. A proper method would have been to only revisit the dumbass bans (like we're doing now) and not consider unbanning scammers without payment plans.

 

Be my valentine @Blade.