KingNeo has reported a post.
Reason:
Forum: Something For All
Assigned Moderators: sypherz, blade bro4, Jack Goff, SellerMan, Superfluous
Posted by: Spyder69
Original Content:
Reason:
Post: Israel versus Palestiniansrude and not helping the topic but insulting the other person for his views. cannot contruct a logical argument
Forum: Something For All
Assigned Moderators: sypherz, blade bro4, Jack Goff, SellerMan, Superfluous
Posted by: Spyder69
Original Content:
Arabs are treated like second class citizens and thats a fact, you're just too ignorant to realize it. I've thrown a couple of links at you, why dont you read them?
Are you blind? How many times have I asked for you to quote specific laws that discriminate against non-Jews. How many times do I have to point out that the law you're bringing up simply enables small rural communities to screen potential residents.
already over said:Are you blind? 0:15 - 0:16
And are you an idiot? You're actually going to defend the person who was shot when he is the aggressor? Do you not see him charging at the van? The level of ignorance in your posts is staggering.
"Shot in cold blood." Right, "cold blood" when he attempted to kill the passenger of that van.
already over said:I'll just quote you
The two-state solution is contingent upon the recognition of Israel and borders that don't compromise security. Get that through your thick skull.
already over said:Also who has the intent to strike whom here?
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4643822,00.html
Who has the intent to completely destroy a country? Do you find the Israeli PM out in public addressing several hundred people "Death to Iran"? Do you? No. Do you find Israeli government doctrine calling for the complete annihilation of Iran or any other Arab nation? Can you find me ANYTHING that parallels the public remarks of the Iranian regime? No, because none exist, and the intent of Israel isn't to destroy anyone. Unlike Iran who for years has made it publicly known their goal is the destruction of Israel.
It's glaringly apparent you've been backed into a corner that you can't get yourself out of.
already over said:
Oh this will be fun.
http://bbcwatch.org/2015/04/06/bbc-again-avoids-informing-audiences-about-pa-debt-to-israel/
You do realize that the "Palestinians" have incurred literally hundreds-of-millions in debt right?
in February 2015 the combined debts of the Palestinian Authority and the Jerusalem District Electric Company (JDECO) to the Israel Electric Corporation (IEC) stood at around $492 million.
already over said:Great, Link me to Nytimes, a few pages ago you claimed they were biased and served as palestinian propaganda.
I've been using the NY Times since I started this thread. So let me guess, something is only "biased" when it doesn't support your argument? Your sources consist of HRW and Adalah, two sources of which have NEVER been truthful on any topic.
Rofl even more bullshit.
already over said:Lebanon?
Why do you keep bringing up Lebanon? Are you aware Hezbollah is still militant?
already over said:Do you want me to quote your statement?
Back up your claim then, the link states that the jews oppose a two-state solution.
You really are a special snowflake. The two-state solution is contingent upon 1. Secure borders and 2. The demilitarization of Hamas.
Answer me this question if you can. If Israel were to concede to a two-state solution this very minute, what do you think would happen? Would Israel get peace? Or would Hamas be brought even closer to cities such as Be'er Sheva, and attack them.
Just realize your answer should reflect how Hamas acted when Israel gave up all of Gaza for peace.
Awesome even more lies. Your quote is from 2009. Tell me more of how the jews and Netanyahu want a two-state solution.
http://www.haaretz.com/news/israel-election-2015/1.647212
http://media.huji.ac.il/new/docs/hu131231_JointPoll_Dec2013.pdf
(4) Demilitarized Palestinian State
Among Palestinians 28% support and 71% oppose the establishment of an independent Palestinian
state that would have no army, but would have a strong security force and would have a
multinational force deployed in it to ensure its security and safety. Israel and Palestine would be
committed to end all forms of violence directed against each other. A similar compromise received
in December 2012, 28% support, and opposition reached 71%.
This item receives the lowest level of support by Palestinians, as in previous polls, although the
current level of support is the highest since 2003. Unlike the refugees and Jerusalem components,
this issue has not received due attention in public discourse, as it should, since it may become a
major stumbling block in the efforts to reach a settlement.
Among Israelis 60% support and 33% oppose this arrangement compared to 70% support and 26%
opposition obtained in December 2012.
As you were saying?
The contingency is the fact that Hamas is militant. Any land that is given up would only bring the rockets closer.
You can stop pretending that the Israeli people don't want a two-state solution.
Also I am still waiting on the lecture regarding my history and the al-aqsa mosque or did you realize you were spouting bullshit all along.
Congratulation, you got me on a single point that I got a mosque wrong. Should I start pointing out that the Jewish Temple Mount was there before yours mosques'?
If you're going to start calling me out on insignificant points (unless getting the name of a mosque is that important, the principle still stands, your holy sites were neglected for decades if not centuries), how about I ask you about that jewishvirtuallibrary post? Hmm?
already over said:Originally Posted by already over View Post
Great source even more propaganda.
http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/...risrael05.html
This website is also where majority of arguments are from. Also exactly what was the point of your quote.
Spyder69 said:How. Utterly. Stupid. Are. You. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61690.htm this link dimwit, everything I quoted came from the link YOU gave me. You literally just called your own source propaganda.
already over said:Quote:
Nice you just ignored the link I posted. Segregation and racism is a problem in Israel and even the authorities acknowledge it, how come you neglect it? I am starting to think you're delusional.
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.550152
http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61690.htm (Ctrl-F, discrimination)spyder69 said:Few posts up, this is your exact post. Are you illiterate? Did you actually Google search those quotes, only to come to the jewishvirtuallibrary? When I took the quotes directly from the government site YOU provided? LOL
Time and time again you prove how dull you are.
















