What have I done?

[Unregistered--->Hermes]

Ever since joining this site, I have been trying to contribute positively. Today, unfortunately I was banned for infraction build-up. Many of my oldest infractions were warranted because I failed to read and understand the rules. However, ever since then, Ive been careful not to build up infractions. Ive also tried to help other people acoid being infracted I believed that my last two infractions were not warranted and am asking for an appeal of my 3 day ban. Please don't take my dispute lightly/ignore it-- are just my last words...

 

Your 2nd to last post you were infracted for:
http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=10174423&postcount=38

Your last post that you were infracted for:
http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=10175700&postcount=17

They're warranted in my opinion.

 

[Unregistered--Hermes]

Let me say 1st that I apologize for writing a second appeal, but ive been waiting patiently for another mod/admin to give their opinion on the temp. ban I received for infractions. Let me also give a more detail reason and explain why I "spammed." I totally respect superman's opinion but just want more people to consult regarding this...

Ever since joining this site, I have been trying to contribute positively. Most of the infractions I received was my failure to read the rules/stickies. However, my two latest infractions that I got--I had no intention of spamming whatsoever...
___________

Infraction #1: http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=10174423&postcount=38

I can see/understand why this would be considered as spam got I did not really contribute to the topic. What I consider as spamming however, is saying things like "lololololol" or "rofllmao" that are totally unrelated to anything. Yes, I said "wrong" but the prices were a bit off in my opinion and again was just trying to help...

Infraction #2: http://www.sythe.org/showpost.php?p=10175700&postcount=17

In my opinion this infraction that I received was a little bit gravedug up. Anyways, the thread was just an off-topic thread--nothing really that serious. On that thread many people "claimed" to have certain xp counters. The OP i believed said to post pics and so I did post pictures of my account for that matter. Saying, "pics or it didnt happen" is not spamming...at least intentionally.
___________

Again im not trying to argue with superman here, but i think that my time and contribution to this site overpowers these slight infractions. Also, there was an account of my dreams that I was interested in purchasing before I got temp banned and that is why waiting 3 days really upsets me.. Montas (Tony) gave me a infraction for signature violation--i apologized and fixed that within 30 mins. Ive helped and directed many people to the right threads, caught a few ban evaders, and tried giving people free signatures when they asked.

Again i ask that this not skim-read--for i have put a lot of time into writing this and I would love for more detailed answers to why I deserve/dont deserve this ban... Could a few others mods/admin give their opinion to this situation also?

 

Merged your new dispute into your old one.

 

[Spraynwipe]

Second infraction link isn't working. First is clear spam and is deserved in my opinion, and the signature violation is a warning (yellow) and isn't included in your infraction count anyway. Looking through your profile you have accumulated several spam infractions this month. My vote is for the ban to remain.

 

[RsProd]

Both of the infractions you're disputing are warranted imo.
- The first added no value to the thread.
- The second was bumping a comment of yours that you had already posted.
The Sig Violation that you have doesn't count towards your total of 5 because it was only a warning.

You have under two days left to wait, I'd like you to wait them out.

 

[Alteranz]

While I know you only have good intentions, and your presence is very much welcome as well as enjoyed in the community Hermes, I'm sorry but you'll need to wait for 2 days.
It falls on Christmas anyhow! You should be with with family instead


Closed.