Let me tell you a story.
Once upon a time, there was a place called Siberia. In Siberia, there were hundreds of volcanoes. One day, every single volcano erupted, releasing more than 2 million cubic meters of lava in only a few thousand years. An area the size of all Europe was drowned in destruction. Along with the lava, over 2 quadrillion tons of CO2 were released into the air. This is about 25000 times the current amount of CO2 in the air.
Everything died.
Do you really think humans have a capacity for that kind of destruction? Even if they cover the world in cows that graze on rice patches and breathe fire onto coal to turn it into energy, do you really think that humans can do things on the scale of that story?
No, they can't, cause they would die too.
You answered your own question?
I would say humans contribute greatly to global warming, there are around 7 billion humans alive right now, more than any other animal. We breed cows, which produce methane and contribute to global warming, we cut down rainforests and increase the amount of co2 in the atmosphere, I could just keep listing things...
Without the human race, the earth would be a much cleaner place.
Then you're wrong. Every glacier has and will melt at some point because of continental drift and changes in the earth's tilt.I argue there are glaciers melting that have NEVER melted in the history of the Earth.
Then you're wrong. Every glacier has and will melt at some point because of continental drift and changes in the earth's tilt.
Note that I don't argue that humans don't hurt the environment at all. Only that global warming is total bullshit and we're wasting money that could be better spent cleaning the oceans and saving rainforests because of ANIMALS, not global warming. Rainforests aren't important because they collect Co2, but because they allow millions of species to survive.
Actually, there is no scientific evidence posted anywhere to back up your claim. In fact, continental drift does occur, but leaves the polar ice caps frozen over. Changes in the Earth's tilt is called "wobble" and the Earth has always spun off axis. Glacial melt; however, is a relatively new thing. If you look at the temperatures over the past 50 years, it has steadily been on the rise. If you look at when things like CFCs were largely used and the toxicity of air (coupled with the condition of the ozone) over that time span, you'll see a surprising correlation between temperature of the planet and condition of our atmosphere.
What hasn't been proven is how much humans really do affect the atmosphere. Yes, CO² emissions do create a dense atmosphere, trapping heat in and ultimately the temperature increases. But, how much do we contribute to it?Again, it's been proved it's real, no arguement tbh

