Another suggestion by Blade!

Discussion in 'Archives' started by Blade, Aug 13, 2010.

Another suggestion by Blade!
  1. Unread #1 - Aug 13, 2010 at 6:17 AM
  2. Blade
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Posts:
    7,249
    Referrals:
    12
    Sythe Gold:
    233
    Two Factor Authentication User Easter 2015 Valentine's Day 2015 Sythe's 10th Anniversary Christmas 2014 Verified Overwatch Master Halloween 2014 SytheSteamer
    OG Club Detective Pokémon Trainer

    Blade tfw 2hi lmao
    Retired Sectional Moderator Cracker Head

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    As you know, my suggestions attract a lot of both positive and negative attention, and I've got another one today.

    My suggestion is to show signatures only once per page in a thread. The signature would be on the last post by the user on the thread. This reduces clutter and memory, and makes the site look more professional.

    Thanks, and comments are appreciated.
     
  3. Unread #2 - Aug 13, 2010 at 6:20 AM
  4. Gurtaton
    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Posts:
    2,912
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Gurtaton Grand Master

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    No, just no.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Aug 13, 2010 at 6:21 AM
  6. blindkilla
    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2005
    Posts:
    1,896
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    6
    Discord Unique ID:
    282000633404456960
    Discord Username:
    sogord

    blindkilla Guru
    $25 USD Donor New

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    I doesn't use that much more memory, and this is the whole idea of introducing google gears.

    I think it would be retarded to only show a persons signature once per page. Would take away from the flow of the layout.
     
  7. Unread #4 - Aug 13, 2010 at 6:23 AM
  8. Gohan
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Posts:
    23,694
    Referrals:
    16
    Sythe Gold:
    248
    Discord Unique ID:
    100075291572998144
    Spam Forum Participant Rust Player

    Gohan Legend
    Retired Sectional Moderator Cracker Head $25 USD Donor Prince Yobabo

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    Sometimes I go back in a thread to see if I can find someones sig really fast and with this implemented it would just be harder to locate someone.
     
  9. Unread #5 - Aug 13, 2010 at 6:24 AM
  10. Tmoe
    Referrals:
    0

    Tmoe Guest

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    Another fail suggestion by Blade!
    fix'd


    Ah, just kidding <3. On topic though, I don't really see the use. Yes, it may reduce memory etc, but signatures aren't that big. Simply skip over the signature..

    So I'd give this a No. Not needed, and wouldn't really change much. It's fine how it is.

    Perhaps just have an option to only show 1 signature per person, per page. Doesn't Sythe have a do not show signature option? Just add onto that.
     
  11. Unread #6 - Aug 13, 2010 at 6:33 AM
  12. Necromancer24
    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2008
    Posts:
    4,440
    Referrals:
    29
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Necromancer24 Grand Master
    Do Not Trade

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    Honestly, it's fine the way it is now.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Aug 13, 2010 at 7:51 AM
  14. i noob killer i
    Joined:
    Feb 29, 2008
    Posts:
    2,524
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    i noob killer i Grand Master
    $5 USD Donor

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    Nope from me buddy just becuse I dont mind signatures that much imo .
     
  15. Unread #8 - Aug 13, 2010 at 11:12 AM
  16. v3-
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Posts:
    510
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    v3- Forum Addict
    Banned

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    Your suggestions never get ANY positive feedback. I can't tell if you're thinking you're being some cutesy troll or not right now.

    Signatures are only stored in one location and then called upon by a process as old as the Internet, linking.

    Once again, please stop making suggestions until you've read atleast one book.

    Edit: the book can be about anything, just please be a little bit less retarded next time you post.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Aug 13, 2010 at 11:40 AM
  18. Sup3r 4ut03r
    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Posts:
    983
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Sup3r 4ut03r Apprentice

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    Yeah, they may be called upon by a process, etc, etc. Whatever. But to load all of those images, GIFs, Avatars, and maybe GIF avatars, it really puts a load on the user's PC if he/she has an old computer. It's annoying as hell to me, too.
     
  19. Unread #10 - Aug 13, 2010 at 11:45 AM
  20. v3-
    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Posts:
    510
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    v3- Forum Addict
    Banned

    Another suggestion by Blade!

    It should have quite a bit more to do with your internet connection than your computer. If your computer is too old to load pictures, that is your problem. The website isn't going to make exceptions for the minute percent of people who have archaic computers that have problems loading pictures.

    If you really think pictures "put a load" on your computer, disable them.
     
< Is anyone here a medical physician? | Domain Names 3.00 For Any .Com! >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest


 
 
Adblock breaks this site