Anarchist Nomocracy

That's the whole point of protectionism. Do not deal with others. Keep all the wealth in your own country. It's protecting the local industry from global competion.

 

I totally agree with you here, but you questioned whether you 'had to negotiate' a few posts earlier.

I said that not trading with other countries is protectionism, agreed? If you follow me now we can continue.

 

I don't think it would be possible. India under democracy is going downhill because they can't pass a 1 child law whilst if it was under communism it would be going better. Do you agree? So you actually grant the people more freedom yet it's not going better at all.

 

But you do are talking about a country (just let me call it a country) ran by nothing but the law, right?

 

Can you expand slightly on the bolded concept?

 

You do when they decide to start to trouble with you, when you're provoked talking should always be the first course of action when applicable.

It's 2010 my friend, there's no way you're going to get even the majority of the universe to believe in one thing that hasn't been around for years.

Saying "that hasn't been around for years" because i'm sure the majority holds believe like the brown stuff in the crust of the Earth is soil, not some alien substance, etc.

Agreed; above.

Courts would no longer be judiciary, as judiciary BRANCH refers to part of a government. If they stood alone they'd be no different than a government.

 

Either you have individuals applying the so-called Hobbesian 'natural law' (ie lynch mobs), or you have this network of private courts, indistinguishable from what we have today.

 

Trouble with individual people can sometimes be most devastating..if anything it is a problem no less than if thousands of people had a quarrel with you.

A government is the organization, machinery, or agency through which a political unit exercises its authority, controls and administers public policy, and directs and controls the actions of its members or subjects.

Therefore please tell me how your theory of Anarchist Nomocracy will play a role so miniscule in excercising it's authority it doesn't deserve the label of government. It seems they'd be in power, and be higher in the hierarchy than the normal "fishermen" (as you've used before.)

If it's solving disputes, as that's what courts to, precedents would be set and eventually it would basically be public policy.

This may be personal opinion, but every government controls the actions of it's subjects...I believe your anarchist nomocracy would do just that, as although it is designed to have the smallest role possible in a persons' life, any amount of influence whatsoever will guide your day-to-day life.

 

Everyone needs a leader

 

Sorry , i might not have fully understood the topic...

but why is it considered spam?? Weren't you guys talking about government ( leaders ) and such??

back to your question :

Probably , when mankind was first started, the more intelligent and charismatic ones would then gather the rest of the people, and give out tasks to them.

The leaders in the present day are probably 'led' by the previous long dead leaders.

 

The court system, sorry for the ambiguity.

You're to tell me a member of the courts won't be more respected than the fisherman that makes annual trips to Hong Kong to sell his wares?

Bolded suggests them being in power over other people, thus creating a power hierarchy in which they'd be on top.

Bolded; see below.

Public policy can be generally defined as the course of action or inaction taken by governmental entities.

Precedents can be defined as an example that is used to justify similar occurrences at a later time.

Precedents are practically public policy.

Comment on the bolded please. I believe it justifies a look into how the more charismatic and intelligent "fishermen" would also rise above the less intelligent ones, thus further complicating the power hierarchy.