A Letter of Complaint, About a so called "Doctor"..

Karl · Aug 3, 2010

Once again, I am writing in response to Mr. Jim Humphry's hastily mounted campaigns, and once again, I merely wish to point out that thanks to Jim's birdbrained intimations, all the people around here, of whatever condition in life, are dejected and sorrowful to an extent that I have never before witnessed. Before I say anything else, let me remind Jim that his arguments would be a lot more effective if they were at least accurate or intelligent, not just a load of bull for the sake of being controversial. I mean, really. While he's out progressively enlarging and increasingly centralizing the means of oppression, exploitation, violence, and destruction, the general public is shouldering the bill. Sadly, this is a bill of shattered minds, broken hearts and homes, depression and all its attendant miseries, and a despondency about Jim's attempts to provide wayward conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread.

Although this letter provides irrefutable proof that there are certainly signs that Jim is becoming increasingly sanguinary, I know that he will still accuse me of lying. I suppose that's okay as long as I can convince you, the reader, that to say that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved is grotty nonsense and untrue to boot. It seems that no one else is telling you that his practices have an unsavory historical track record. So, since the burden lies with me to tell you that, I suppose I should say a few words on the subject. To begin with, some people are responsible and others are not. Jim falls into the category of "not".

At first blush, it appears that Jim's few successes exhibit no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity. However, Jim is entirely shabby, as he has proved to my complete satisfaction. He will probably throw another hissy fit if we don't let him distort and trivialize the debate surrounding cameralism. At least putting up with another Jim Humphry hissy fit is easier than convincing Jim's flunkies that if Jim can't stand the heat, he should get out of the kitchen. Since I don't know him that well, I'll have to be a bit presumptuous when I say that Jim wants to place self-righteous desperados of one sort or another at the head of a nationwide kakistocracy. You know what groups have historically wanted to do the same thing? Fascists and Nazis. The bottom line is that I condemn Mr. Jim Humphry's carnival-barker gimmicks.