Steorn back-EMF cancellation motor replicated

This has me really interested. I wanna build one now. I have the magnet part down, as for harvesting the electricity, it'd take a lot more supplies than I can get.

If they switched to EMF, dams would become obsolete, tbh. This is really quite interesting, and much easier than fusion .

 

I can't believe you are considering this. If energy can be created, so can mass I suppose; turning nothing into something. If anything, I thought you'd be the skeptic. Free-energy hoaxes have been going on for ages. I heard about this one a long time ago... and recently, it was decredited by his own hand-picked panel of scientists.

There's absolutely nothing to get excited about here. All I see is a guy making a hoax for commercial gain (note how all his up-close demos have failed).

 

Not surprising; if you hold Newtonian physics at doubt, Einstienian must be some far off alien realm.

This of course is after hundreds of experiments where both special and general relativity have held their ground (this theory IS falsifiable).

I suppose the skeptic would assume hoax until documented proof of otherwise. That's not what I'm seeing here.

Neutral fairness? How so? His hand-picked jury said there was NO evidence. No evidence, particulary from partial jury, should not be considered a statement of neutrality.

The device wasn't documented or tested properly. This video is nothing different than the hundreds out there that "prove" psychokinesis is real.

 

I was actually thinking of making a modified pin wheel and slightly changing it so on each pin is 2 magnets, one with a like pole and one with an unlike pole. Then you have the two on each side of the pin wheel, both push and pull on the wheel, which, I think, would allow it to start spinning without any manual turning and such...

Something I thought about all night .

I just wanna try it out, the two sites you provided had some information, but it wasn't really thorough. Is there a journal about this yet?

Well, yeah... I guess =/. There's a lot of new discoveries that we're coming into, and it'd be foolish to not accept the possibility that some of what we know to be true, to be false.

This whole thing is very plausible.

 

Yea. Seems these script-kiddies never get bored.

I'm pretty sure it's been done or at least inferred from the vice versa. That is, in both nuclear fission + fusion, a small amount of mass is lost and converted into pure energy. I suppose I'll stop at that and we can discuss this another time.

When you cut through the mumbo jumbo, you get to the conclusion that he hasn't documented empirical evidence of overunity yet.

I think the better discussion here is whether or not the "new physical phenomenon" was even reproduced.

 

My brother brought up a good point, he says it should be tried in a 0 gravity environment. I agree that, that would help with the proposal.

 

Yes, if the device was proven to work properly, this would be the next stance to take.

I don't think gravity is relevant. More relevant is a zero-friction environment.