Lessening Scamming

Discussion in 'Denied Suggestions' started by Run3x General, Nov 28, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Lessening Scamming
  1. Unread #1 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:12 AM
  2. Run3x General
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    65
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Run3x General Member

    Lessening Scamming

    Hello,
    I just wanted to get in a quick suggestion that could greatly reduce scamming, lol. I think Sythe should have verification levels, or "stages". I got this idea from rscheata.net, and they have S1, S2, and S3, S1 is PayPal account verification, Which is somewhat like the donations people give, and could be anywhere from $0.01 to $5.00, depending on what is decided. S2 is Phone # verified with the PayPal account, and address filed, Which will give the seller more trust. S3 will be Address verification, and the applicant will have to receive and send a letter to an admin or whomever is picked to do the verifications, and it will have to match the PayPal verified one. Then you could make it so there is a section of S1+ trades, S2+ trades, and S3 trades. Then Post Count, and shady vouches wouldn't come into consideration. Sorry about this not looking very nice, just wanted to get it posted. Post any comments or additions.

    *Anyone who says this is a bad idea and doesn't give a reasonable explanation as to WHY its a bad idea, will be considered a spammer/scammer :p*

    Edit: Lol, take note that now most of the people against this are now banned for scamming ;P And what I meant in the beginning was that it was OPTIONAL, just an added bonus. I don't really care anymore, it would just save a hella amount of money for some people, instead of using OMM's. And I think it also would be effective because I know if I was scammed for more than 120 dollars I would definitely go to the persons house (saying they are fully verified), and if it was less than 50 it wouldn't have been worth it to scam. I don't really care anymore :p
     
  3. Unread #2 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:18 AM
  4. yami
    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2007
    Posts:
    434
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    yami Forum Addict

    Lessening Scamming

    What about the ones who don't have paypal?

    The whole things seems like a hassle, but if you take out the paypal part of it... While if the admins are willing to deal with it, I don't mind.
     
  5. Unread #3 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:20 AM
  6. Kadaj
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Posts:
    6,087
    Referrals:
    6
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Kadaj You only live once, yolo.
    Banned

    Lessening Scamming

    I don't know about anyone else, but I wouldn't want to give me information out to other members. Also, there is 185,990 members on Sythe, I don't think Admins would like to send and recieve 185,990 letters.

    No support.
     
  7. Unread #4 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:20 AM
  8. KingPkz
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2009
    Posts:
    270
    Referrals:
    0
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    KingPkz Forum Addict
    Banned

    Lessening Scamming

    I think the OMM option stops all scamming and refering to stickies also
     
  9. Unread #5 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:24 AM
  10. Aje
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Posts:
    697
    Referrals:
    16
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Aje Apprentice

    Lessening Scamming

    This is a copy idea from RSCA
     
  11. Unread #6 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:26 AM
  12. Run3x General
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    65
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Run3x General Member

    Lessening Scamming


    It not only for paypal, it could also be used for other money transfers, but the majority of people on here use paypal. What about for Pin trades? No one wants to take the time to get an OMM for a pin trade, and if pin sellers were required to have S3, they wouldn't scam. Also, not ALL 185K members are active, and most are scammers anyways and wouldn't even try to become verified. for every 1 good buyer i get for something i get 45+ scammers.
     
  13. Unread #7 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:27 AM
  14. Run3x General
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    65
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Run3x General Member

    Lessening Scamming

    Aje i stated that in my first post :p
     
  15. Unread #8 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:28 AM
  16. Kadaj
    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2008
    Posts:
    6,087
    Referrals:
    6
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Kadaj You only live once, yolo.
    Banned

    Lessening Scamming

    I still don't think the Admins would like to give out their address' so people can send them pointless letters.
     
  17. Unread #9 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:29 AM
  18. Run3x General
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    65
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Run3x General Member

    Lessening Scamming

    Also, the part about giving info out out to other members, If your going to do a trade, your giving your info out to other members, and It wouldn't say the persons phone number or address in their profile, just that they have a certain level of verification.
     
  19. Unread #10 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:30 AM
  20. Run3x General
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    65
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Run3x General Member

    Lessening Scamming

    P.O. Box. thats what RSCA has i believe.
     
  21. Unread #11 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:51 AM
  22. Aje
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Posts:
    697
    Referrals:
    16
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Aje Apprentice

    Lessening Scamming

    Sythe has that for donations too
     
  23. Unread #12 - Nov 28, 2009 at 11:51 AM
  24. Aje
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2007
    Posts:
    697
    Referrals:
    16
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Aje Apprentice

    Lessening Scamming

    You ediited your first post after I posted.
     
  25. Unread #13 - Nov 28, 2009 at 12:19 PM
  26. Excel'
    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2009
    Posts:
    106
    Referrals:
    1
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Excel' Active Member
    Banned

    Lessening Scamming

    Too much hassle when everyone contains something called "common sense".

    No support.
     
  27. Unread #14 - Nov 28, 2009 at 12:20 PM
  28. Gohan
    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2007
    Posts:
    23,695
    Referrals:
    16
    Sythe Gold:
    248
    Discord Unique ID:
    100075291572998144
    Spam Forum Participant Rust Player

    Gohan Legend
    Retired Sectional Moderator Cracker Head $25 USD Donor Prince Yobabo

    Lessening Scamming

    What would be the point in this? I think it's fine where it's at
     
  29. Unread #15 - Nov 28, 2009 at 1:22 PM
  30. 1227
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2007
    Posts:
    2,912
    Referrals:
    13
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    1227 Grand Master | Arizona
    Banned

    Lessening Scamming

    No..Just no. We arent rscheata.net.. And people acknowledge who they are trading with and can choose whether or not to trade based on vouches, join dates etc..
     
  31. Unread #16 - Nov 28, 2009 at 1:42 PM
  32. Nick
    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Posts:
    7,204
    Referrals:
    40
    Sythe Gold:
    80

    Nick ♬♩ Young Forever ♪ ♫

    Lessening Scamming

    There is absolutely no chance the staff would do this.
     
  33. Unread #17 - Nov 28, 2009 at 1:47 PM
  34. Harped
    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2009
    Posts:
    2,172
    Referrals:
    37
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Harped Troll

    Lessening Scamming

    This^

    Plus, I don't really want anyone off Sythe knowing my address/phone number.
     
  35. Unread #18 - Nov 28, 2009 at 2:16 PM
  36. Run3x General
    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2009
    Posts:
    65
    Referrals:
    2
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Run3x General Member

    Lessening Scamming

    nope i underlined, bold'd, italic'd, and made it red.
     
  37. Unread #19 - Nov 28, 2009 at 2:28 PM
  38. Sin666
    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Posts:
    6,989
    Referrals:
    21
    Sythe Gold:
    0
    Two Factor Authentication User Detective Heidy

    Sin666 Hero
    Crabby Retired Administrator

    Lessening Scamming

    We've considered various forms of verification, and even tried something like it in the past (or Thorpe did, anyway). The problem is that many users don't feel comfortable giving away that sort of information, regardless of their intentions. Additionally, it would take multiple staff to manage, there are easy ways around verification (ie, using a friend's address), and even with genuine information, there's not much we can do to respond to a scam. Hell, Sigex's information was posted for months, and it never got anywhere. There's also an issue of how much proof is required before we're willing to release personal information, etc.
     
  39. Unread #20 - Nov 28, 2009 at 4:01 PM
  40. Point Blank
    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2009
    Posts:
    79
    Referrals:
    3
    Sythe Gold:
    0

    Point Blank Member
    Banned

    Lessening Scamming

    I like this Idea. I'd use it.
     
< Reason for bans?? | Can a mod redo this thread? >

Users viewing this thread
1 guest
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.


 
 
Adblock breaks this site