War; a form of population reduction- a necessary evil.

wars can be good to remove dictatorships but not to produce more food what a load of shit

 

Dude, even the killing of the Jews in WWII didn't make a big difference on the world population, and that was a genocide. War is no big difference either. Now if it is nuclear war, which can wipe out nations, then yes it will make an impact on the population of the world, but the wars today aren't a big enough impact. Only Thousands are dying, not millions.

 

I agree with you, I actual agree with you, Why do so many little 14 year boys think they have the right to say who lives and who dies. It doesn't matter what nationality, education, race, age, sex you should respect all humans.

 

in other words, bottle neck effect

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_bottleneck

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/evo101/IIID3Bottlenecks.shtml

 

In a way; yes.

But not so extreme.. less inbreeding and all.

The 'evolutionary event', would be starvation and lack of shelter.

 

Overpopulation is a serious risk to the humans as resources become more scarce. However, inciting war as a method of population control is ABSOLUTELY insane. War is only necessary when protecting a nation or even removing a corrupt leader.

 

there are too many humans on the planet, so how can overpopulation be a bad thing, it's not like we value life killing everything that moves

 

Please rephrase that.

Your comment made absolutely no sense at all.

 

humans don't value life , rephrased enough?

 

I was saying this is an outcome of war, aswell as technology, treaties, cultural blending and the like.

I wasn't saying "Let's make a military state so we can wipe half the populous off the Earth."

 

Oh the the irony

 

70% of foods eaten are farmed not hunted. War is different. It is not as if we are eating the other people, why bring war into this?

(I am referencing from title of the thread.)

 

The only thing you can compare hunting to war is the killing.
People don't put out wars for food it's mostly based on land and religon.

 

War can be a necessary evil. That is how Adolf Hitler brought Germany out of the Depression. He gave them jobs creating tanks, planes, guns, ammunition, bombs, and the sort. War like it has been said before usually improves a countries economy, but when the war is over there is usually a vast amount of damage done to land, animals, and people. I do not support any war be it the ones on terror, hunger, or disease. When one enemy is defeated a new one emerges...

 

Please, re-read what you quoted.

I was stating the similarity to us hunting animals, and killing men.

Not feeding on men.
And not feeding on animals either, but the result of killing the animals, and the men.

This is what I stated.

This is true.

 

i beleive hunting is necessary. If animals never were killed there would be no meat, and the animal population would increase by a huge margine.

 

Yes, and this huge margine would be weak and hungry.

By hunting, you give more food to the other animals, which takes the population down and makes them more stronger.

I've stated this above.

 

We farm, Yes. What do we get from farming? Yes, we get a fantastic amount of food sources, but we cannot get our necessary amount of nutrients from just farming. We hunt, get meat for protein. Also to eliminate the number of population that is killing us from running out infront of us while we are driving.

War is the same, we kill necessary people so that innocent people can go a day without being shot, stabbed, blown up by their own kind.

 

You imbecile. Do you think when you eat your meat, a hunter shot a cow/deer in the middle of the forest and brought it to a factory? What Sythe meant was, we have cattle farms, chicken farms, fish farms, etc. we only hunt for leisure or if your rich enough to send somebody out there to hunt you some fresh meat.

Also, if you don't know, WE DON'T EAT PEOPLE.

Over population isn't the cause of people running in front of you while your driving, its people who don't know how or when to walk across a street. If more accidents were occurring on the roads, you don't kill off people so the number reduces, you teach them the safe way to drive, you make better roads, better vehicles, etc etc!

You say this as if the only reason for war is that. Look at modern day wars, most of them aren't self-defense as you describe.

OH YES! Thank God humans arrived to the earth just on time to hunt animals, they were so weak and hungry before us! WTF ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT? Do you know anything about nature? The ecosystem? BIOLOGY and EVOLUTION?

More humans = more people buying stuff = better economy.
More humans = more people making food.
More humans = more people MAKING PRODUCTS for us to buy.
More humans = POSITIVE, NOT A NEGATIVE.

The earth is sufficient enough to occupy 229 BILLION humans and each of them having 1/4 acre of land. What you say might be right if the world was running on a limited supply of food, which it is absolutely NOT, killing humans isn't going to fix anything in the long run and is definitely immoral.