invalid report

Link the current Sythe account:
Which violation you are reporting the user for: User says he sold 5B and another user went first, When asked he then says it was more than 1 trade, giving false sense of trust.
Why you think they're violating Sythe rules:



Shady shit, would request proof of the trade along with confirmation that @Limiq and/or others that they give PAK bills of gold with no confirmations.

 

you do not get to see my chat log and business information, that is spam forum. Not valid report, simple. I do not need to share my business or prove to you anything, you take this out of context and open a report is just false claim. If mod want to verify they can, but this is just troll report from a spam forum post... so much stupidity on sythe...

 

The wording you use is extremely misleading. Here you claim you don't have to wait for 1 confirmation and proceed to say you buy bills from said user giving the impression of not having to wait for 1 confirmation on bills.



Asking Limiq about this and he said it was like 300,400,500m's at a time.



And in response I want talking about personally seeing the chat logs but for a mod to verify, but you seem to not understand or have a brain, either or.

 

still spam forum, you are not judge jury or executioner, it is spam forum... And I thought I was new here...

 

@WooWoo do you have any evidence that has this has been claimed outside of the spam forum/discord?

 

@Tyler sorry this user waste your time here, I am off to sleep very tired now. I have sent all proof to you for close the report here as this is waste of staff time and another false claim to my name by silly users.

 

@Tyler
[resolved]
In a trade with KingZaib which is NOT in spam forums he says this Screenshot - 9c70def6fd601444bff56f1ec893d523 - Gyazo
The way he puts it it gives the sense that he buys bills from limiq and other without them waiting on 1 confirmation.
When inquired about limiq said
Screenshot - e2f25e5da370a3c3ac5692697d1a63bc - Gyazo
that he does but only like 300,400,500m's per transaction.

 

I don't see enough here to warrant a TWC or otherwise.

In regards to previous disputes, if the moderator in question that dealt with the report thought it warranted a TWC they would have gave one at the time of report.