Rating System on staff performance.

That's what staff feedback threads are for?

Would be a popularity contest and would promote toxicity. What do we have to gain from boiling down a staff member's effectiveness to a single number? They do a lot of stuff that people don't see that would leave a bias towards those who work on more public matters.

Do you have anything to back this up other than your own belief?

 

Wrong lmao.



No support. Its done internally for a reason. You as a regular user have no idea how staff operates and therfore would not do well in rating staff on their performance. This is completely avoiding the fact that more toxic members of the website would use this to gang up on certain staff they didnt like.

 

I would actually leave negative feedback for some staff members, but I don't do it because I don't want to end up on their bad side.

 

Sorry ABM, no support on this one.

The public eye only see the tip of the iceberg when it comes to moderation duties, therefore it would be an inaccurate representation of their involvement and performance.

 

Well if you're too scared to leave negative feedback you obviously don't want your voice heard that bad.

 

Or I'm not here to cause any trouble
Unless it directly affects me, I'd rather stay silent and mind my own business.

But if I could do it anonymously, I probably would.

 

When such a system is necessary, or even being thought about it tends to imply that staff have lost some of the community's trust(with at least some members).

This is clearly in relation to the other thread which got almost 6,000 views and basically broadcast "STAFF IS CORRUPT" to the entire website for weeks on end to thousands of users.

I'm neutral IMO, are we at a stage where the community as a whole feels they need to be able to rate staff more in-depth in a public way as a means of "Reining them in?" so to speak? I don't know how the community feels as a whole so I cannot reach a judgement one way or the the other without first knowing the community wants more public auditing of staff.

My personal thoughts remain precisely what they were in the above mentioned thread,

Neutral.

 

I’m obviously new here but I’ve noticed that the average sythe user is fucking stupid and the staff team as a whole are incompetent.

Both support and no support.

 

Staff already have a feedback system in place in order to hold everyone accountable. If someone isn't pulling their weight or isn't showing effort, it will be shown. Regular users are encouraged to use individual feedback threads and the overall staff feedback sticky as a means of rating or commenting on staff performance. At the end of the day, in the small chance that this would be passed, it'd ultimately result in many staff members being unfairly rated by those who aren't able to see actual staff performance. Denied.