Dear Rich

approve my ui plz it was handmade by felix123

 

True, but their contribution to peoples existence is a far more better use of human potential.

Either way men and women are superior in their own ways. I don't think anyone can really claim one is superior then the other. They're just superior then the other in different ways. You don't see men hold a child in their womb for give or take nine months, go through childbirth for give or take 30-50 hours, raise, feed, teach their child to walk, talk, live for majority of their child-lives, up into teens and even sometimes into adult hood.

Women naturally are better at maternal instincts, if we had to we would fight to save a child's life, even if it wasn't our child. Does that mean we're not strong because we're not using all our effort to protect, fight etc constantly? Or does it make us more intelligent to not always use it. Men tend to be naturally better at hard-work labour etc, building, construction etc so naturally they go for those type of jobs, which also tends to decrease their life-span.

The male human race are further advanced in life then women have, because history dictates women as home-wives, naturally it lingers on and men are just further advanced then the female counterparts in terms of work. The societies we live in have always allowed men to be further in a lot of fields. Yeah physically majority of men tend to be stronger. Women tend to live longer.

There is loads of ifs and buts and whys and whats, at the end of the day I don't believe either is superior then the other, but in different circumstances they are superior/inferior. There are loads of scientific evidence to prove one or the other, it just is dependent on what you believe is right. Whether it be that women have double XX chromosomes so our bodies are better at fighting off illnesses, or whether men tend to focus more on actually getting somewhere in life in terms of work.

On top of that there is 66M more men in the world so it differentiates the statistics a little. World population 2016 | World population clock ..contrast that vs different countries. India, they're known for wanting to kill girl babies. China have laws to prevent babies being born (more men in china/india)Western countries have had mainly men go to war/fight in wars (usa/uk/russia have more women). Heritages, cultures, religions, traditions, politics/laws, wars. It's dependent on where anyone lives in the world, the type of countries they live in etc, economic abilities, social constructs, political agendas, west/east etc to really define whether men/women are superior.

 

lol mfw people actually believe women aren't superior to men

im a fucking cuck my wife beats the shit out of me daily i worship her feet

 

Your argument primarily relies on both anecdotal and appeal to ignorance fallacies. Just because there is no proof for one side does not mean that lack of evidence is proof for the other.

This would be a false cause. I'd love to hear some of your arguments as I do admit you're a smart man, but I'd expect you to know that you cannot fill your evidence with logical fallacies and think you're actually correct with your evidence.

 

You're half right

 

you're actually a piece of shit lol i thought we were cool

 

Oh shit I thought he quoted sonias post and said you're a smart man, disregard my previous post I thought I saw an opportunity to call @Sonia a man which I could not pass up

 

Women have boobies and a warm penis-holder. We need to give them a chance.

 

we have foreskin lol

 

The lucky ones do. Where is the foreskin thread, anyways?

 

Sonia already tried the "women have vaginas" argument it didn't work out.

She also tried the "men make up 50.9% of earth's population so the statistics are invalid" argument

 

Hey, no arguments here... I'm just talking about things I like.

 

You do however raise a good point about the boobs

 

She is more superior than @Sythe because her asshole has more hair on it than his. Living in the wild for too long will do that to a woman

 

A lack of proof for one side does not function as proof for the other. Evidence for an argument and evidence against an argument are entirely different. You cannot say "these numbers don't prove your point therefore they prove mine," as that is a fallacious train of thought.

Similarly, saying "it fits the facts" does not make it so. You provide an explanation, not a fact. I ask you once again, provide arguments not filled with fallacies.