Re: A Note on Quality

In my opinion staff should use the 'we will be monitoring general discussion more heavily' to give the original creator of the thread a proper punishment for posting an obvious spam thread in a serious section.

 

There was another report on the thread requesting it to be moved to SF by a Sythe user and that report was denied by a global (this was after it got moved back to general discussion).

Well, staff moved it back to general discussion so I don't think that would be good to do.

 

So... moving forward then, can we get a valid reasoning from this mysterious global as to why it was moved back to general discussion and why they denied further requests to move it back...?

 

Quality is subjective, don't forget that.

 

Tbh I really think it should be in SF. It's unfortunate to see a thread of vulgar nature be put (and back) in GD, however, the legitimacy of the question in OP was innocent so I guess it's not too big of a deal.

& Dalty, your arguing didn't/doesn't help anything and it's annoying. Your input was literal spam, and turned into a series of responses that weren't relevant. Heads came here with an honest question & feedback and your first response was "Your constant shit posting is terrible. Why do you care?"

 

It's closed as a result of this thread, the OP may create the same thread in SF if he wishes to

 

How wasn't it a conversation though? People were actually discussing whether or not they've compared dick sizes. Kind of seems like some people (female Clinton supporters) felt offended and repeatedly reported the thread.

 

Lmao not only that this is even a discussion that's taking place but in the fact that you guys can't even have a serious discussion about why a penis thread isn't real discussion

and ya'll wonder why many of us can't take this site seriously anymore