Keeping track

This thread is literally about me paying back, did you read the OP lol?

 

I'm not here to argue about DNT. I alongside others completely disagree with it but in the end you can delete all the rules, it's your decision.

4 years ago Karl scammed Arcus wether intentionally or not doesn't really fucking matter. A year later he states on a private server he still has no money to even think about repaying.

3 years later we hear nothing but since he posted a thread we're supposed to believe him without any confirmation from Arcus about any payment plans or whatnot.

And as your last statement, this excuse of a human being didn't have any intention of paying him back the last 4 years, I'm sure it's this forum user's fault for 'pushing him away' from doing any repayment /s.

 

2005 had better cards than this meta.

P O T O F G R E E D
M O N S T E R R E B O R N
H E A V Y S T O R M

 

So true, there were a lot of ways to win, but it was simplistic and satisfying. Now you have XYZ summoning (What the fuck am I doing math here?) Pendulum summoning, all this summoning IDK WTF it means. Synchro monsters. MFW @Niki played Blue Eyes White Dragon and got laughed at cuz he's worthless now.

Yugioh got cucked harder than EOC cucked Runescape.

 

if*

If they do pay back all their debts, they will still have that cloud hovering over their head, but at least the scammed money is paid back.

 

might*

 

yeah he should totes buy a safe

 

he didn't steal anything you retard

 

he didn't scam anyone you retard. arcus took a risk lending karl money that he might not be able to pay back. he wasn't able to pay it back since he went bankrupt. Karl is under no moral or legal obligation to pay Arcus back. you are literally retarded

 

Nice meme

 

Well it would be morally wrong if he didn't pay back the debut? So doesn't that mean he is under moral obligation to pay it back. Saying that we all have different morals so.....

 

arcus took a risk and that risk came back to bite him. if karl had the means to pay him back and he didn't, that would be one thing but he is a poor fuck

 

"moral obligation"

So there's nothing "wrong" in asking your "friend" at the time for a loan you money which after 4 yours have clearly shown no intention to repay apart from attention posts.

Also don't even bother trying to use the "legality" aspect, when it's completely irrelevant to a forum that's almost only bound on morals.

Thank fuck you're not staff.

Care to list how many users have DNT and how many have repayed excluding the two that where doing it before DNT was ever released?

Also you're still speaking like it's certain he'll repay hmm.

 

you're a fucking retard @SuF holy shit, lemme hold 2 stacks for a min since i'm under no moral or legal obligation to pay you back homie

 

Shut the fuck up.

 

Ethics probably is more accurate. But the site's owner seems confident "the legality aspect" is relevant: "We needed to slim down staff anyways" - Big Rich 2k16

Why is invective a desirable alternative?

 

Stop hating on my boy Rich, he's trying his best to suit everyones needs ok? If you don't like it, don't use the site