BLEUSKITTLE requesting a pardon for (Previously) Gambling with money I dont have

Not even sure if this is a bannable/pardonable offence.

I plan on becoming a honest and reputable member of sythe, I have wanted to post this for awhile now, But recently I had a user scam quit me dicing for 40M and it brought me back to thinking about it.


Your profile link: http://www.sythe.org/members/293105-bleuskittle.html

Report/post/reason that got you banned: N/A

Proof of contacting victims for repayment or repayment of victims: N/A

Anything you weren't banned for but want to confess to now: Below

Detailed description of the events that took place and why you think we should forgive you:

Before I was unbanned on BLEUSKITTLE, I had a previous account named KELDEO. During my adventures on sythe I was an avid gambler in the dicing donor lounge. I diced a user (cant remember users name) during the day for roughly $40 of RSGP. I accepted the bet of the amount I lost knowing that I didn't have the money to payout if I lost. I ended up winning the dice, but didnt feel right afterwards for gambling with money I didn't have.

Did you fully read and follow this sticky thread in the pardon section?:
To the best of my ability.

I felt terrible because I should have admitted to this offence much eariler, Since the occurrence I have been trusted with a highest $120 dice payout, As well as these sythe achievements.

Code:

12-24-2014 Donated total 300$ + SVU
1-14-2015 Became Official Sythe Bond Holder
1-15-2015 3000 posts + 150 vouches
Highest MM to date - Multipule $200+ trades.

 

I can't remember the exact date Shin and I had that added to the dicing rules but it was after you were finished using KELDEO. While it was probably common sense then it still wasn't quite cemented in stone formally.

Obviously it's wrong to do so but I'm of the opinion to rather have this noted and be grateful that this was brought forward on your own initiative rather than ban you and go through the whole pardon process. Would like a second opinion on that however.

 

Agreed with Jack Goff, don't see any reason for punishment,especially since you were forthcoming about it.

 

It was before the rule, this isn't necessary.

I appreciate the honesty though