Viou / un just dude

indeed, as i never see him in SF ne more.

and the soab needs to read the pm i sent him like a week ago

 

When did that 50b occur? Link? Dont forget the snappy thing, where r2p sold an account and I dont believe he was held responsible when it was recovered by his worker. Dont quote me on that as I could be wrong, I just remember talking to snappy and that led him to quit sythe based on the outcome.

 

that sure is a nice new shiny advert/

 

well atleast he removed the north american company thing, being that 90% of the people in his company don't even live in NA rofl.

 

All this spam forum pressure guys, don't do it!

 

Well shiet, if it tastes good ima still eat it

 

just sayin man its gnna make your pooper shoot un happy.

 

its always un happy

 

I understand where you're coming from, it just seems like you're on his side because all of the things that have happened recently with him have been pretty shady. There is still a lot of animosity at the fact that Viou was used more as a sacrificial lamb and show of force for the staff and the same with Un dude. Though I agree with Just Un Dude's ban. I don't know enough about Viou's to decide either way. As I said before I would have to read the guide to decide.

 

rofl.

other than there are 3 girls too many, it is accurate.

 

you need to suck it up, and go confirm or deny my idea i pm'd you about last week.

 

Hat was viciously attacked by those babies. He had no choice but to defend himself.

 

LOL pic........

 

this did happen, i cant seem to find it though....he claimed it has "been years" and was not held responsible for it

which is bullshit IMO

 

not too sure what your trying to say but i assume you linked that for this part -
"whereas an employee acting in his or her own right rather than on the employer's business is undertaking a "frolic" and will not subject the employer to liability."

so your saying if "r2anne" was to sell an account under r2pleasents wishes, then later recovers the account herself noone is held responsible?

or did i miss something