Remove Flaming Rule?

Poll is invalid. Wow blows is gay

 

+1 interwebs for you.

 

Oh, big Ol' jet airliner, dont carry me too far away

 

Might I suggest that you bring back MegaMatt's thread and edit that instead of having the new thread? I assume you can 1-click edit other people's posts so why was it necessary to remove the old one?

 

I'll think about it

 

Fuck you for posting that BS.

And Heads, you're retarded.

 

It's just pi. Can I not post pi? This IS the spam forum. We don't need limits for things or anything like that!

 

Please also remove

²Trolling a moderator is strictly prohibited; repeated offenses exhibit poor character and repeated/serious offenses may result in a ban.


I do it all the time, and never get banned, so don't make rules you can't enforce.

 

Anymore flooding and I will start blasting infractions

 

go infract sythe for flooding potamus or stop being an assho

 

I voted yay, because from the two options present, I agreed with that one more. However, I do feel that some limits should exist. I feel if a large group of users and/or mods are offended by someone's post, then a warning is in order, which would then be followed by an infraction if the blastings continue. My thing is that whatever rule is in place needs to be enforced each and every time, not just occasionally.

 

I swear you guys are bipolar. When was mass gravedigging added to the spam forum rules again?

and if it's part of the rules then why do mods always fucking do it

 

i was making a point

 

This is more of the goal. Even with getting rid of the flaming rule we will still only let it get so far we cant just totally not mod the section.

Nice.

 

get rid of that shit who gives a fuck. censorship is ridiculous here compared to the majority of big forums on the internet.

 

You guys don't understand. It's like censoring porn, and you guys are expecting people to still enjoy it.

 

and also firez, why have you infracted me? what post? which rule did i break? any post i have made in the feedback/suggestions section contained relevance in the post. just because i express my thoughts with colorful words shouldnt mean i get infracted. what's with the censorship? why does it matter if i state my opinion with inflammatory remarks? rights of speech?