Drawn penises

There's been a couple times I have seen clearly drawn penises and its not considered porn.


The obvious downside of this is its NSFW, which is why also in the upper spam you have to tag with NSFW so why is it okay?

 

It should be deleted if no nsfw tags were added, if they were too bad. I don't want a rule against it because that'd be silly.

 

wasnt in upperspam.

The majority of them are just in the regular spam forum.

 

And? The majority of the SF is NSFW. You're allowed to post bikini pictures and stuff.

 

I would assume there's a difference between bikinis and obvious genitalia.

 

Unless the drawing is ridiculously detailed, I don't see the point of enforcing it within the spam forum.

 

Are you offended by art?

 

8=====>

 

infracted.

lol jk but I would support this. I wouldnt like these darwing anywhere beside where they belong and they dont belong in SF.

 

Paint type drawn penises are not porn.hell tbh id have a hard time calling them nsfw.


Op is just a mad faggot because he made a bet concerning signatures. He lost and there was a poorly drawn paint penis on it.

That and he's neckbeard who will continue to work at BK for the remainder of his life.

 

perm ban for saying 8 = >

when really 8>x=21


so therfore 8=>(8 equals greater than)

 

Cute.



If I had an issue with the one that Planker made because I lost the sig duel I would have refused to use it because it was against sythes rules.

I'm talking about really detailed ones. That a person behind you or something would be able to tell it's a penis

 

I'm not offended, but they are not what I come to this forum to see. Why not just put them in nsfw, and those who wish to view them can, likewise with those who don't want to see them.

 

I haven't honestly seen any. Just 2 second paint doodles on pictures in SF.

Any examples for context??

 

Agreed. What if i'm viewing forums and I have a young kid that takes a glance over it? Tells their mother i'm showing him dicks? NSFW tag or gtfo

 

Well its not as easy as that we have to classify what would be considered "too graphic" as opposed to what the people posted above. obvious penises made out of just text like above I don't have an issue with.

Also what determines what makes a drawn one nsfw? we cant force people to put nsfw on threads (except for upper spam which allows porn)

 

Im serious, where are these penises?

 

it's all true - it comes down to maturity in the end

 

I think if its a joke sub forum i don't see the problem with something like this. I mean you know what you're getting into. Also a beautiful penis is nothing to be ashamed of.

 

If a SF post can't contain a simple, penis drawn in 5 seconds, then there shouldn't be chicks with their tits half hanging out as people's avatars, sigs, or other postings. (However, I'd rather see the latter)

I abstain from this.