This really is very situational. The whole report was.
I fully admit that I logged on to the guys account, but it had nothing of value really. He had even admitted after that it may not have been me who did it (after the first dispute was settled and I was unbanned).
Karl should have private...
It makes perfect sense that it was half of my current cash pile so it was what I was willing to risk.
If I scammed 350m, why would I make a thread about having an additional 350m, and going to box with it? I have a few threads of staking pictures with me winning over 300m, which makes sense as...
What? I had over 700m at that point. I never stole that 350m...
You're saying that if someone collects Santa hats, then is accused of scamming one, and then he tries to sell one, he scammed it? Your logic makes no sense.
I was just banned again because "Karl reviewed your old ban dispute and it's worthy of a ban".
After that ban dispute was settled, Peppered (the guy who filed it) even admitted that it might not have been me who did it. He was very mature and said that someone else may have had access as well...