Dicing 200m

[Mikencloud]

So, if i started at 15m, and lost, so then i did 30m and still lost, so then i did 60m, what are the odds that this actually works? What are your experiences with this method?

 

[tesla man 3]

the method theoretically works. but at the same time, it theoretically doesnt.

in my experience, this hasnt worked for shit.

i have rolled 5 or under like 7 times in a row before.

theoretically, every roll is random.... therefore just because you roll low, doesnt mean you roll high the next time.

not to mention, there is more variables than your own roll.

just because you roll high doesnt mean they wont also.

you could roll a 10, then they roll a 11 or 12....

the method doesnt really work to a point where you can guarantee anything.

it is merely a strategy.

 

[euro-case]

It will only work if you got enough money to double like 20 times. So minimum is 1b+, and even then you dont have guarantee.

 

[Snow Patrol]

Chances of winning = 50%

Chances of winning two in a row = 50% x 50% = 25%

Chances of losing two in a row = 50% x 50% = 25%

Chances of losing one and winning one = 50% x 50% = 25% x 2 = 50%

yadda yadda yadda, if you wanna learn more about this method of gambling just make your way to this wikipedia link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)

 

[mill3n]

You have to know that dices are actually random. As Snow pointed out, there's a 25% chance of losing 2x in a row, but it's easily possible to lose 8x in a row, as every roll is separate. Chances are low that it happens though, as every roll has that same 50% chance of winning.

 

[Lovianian]

This method is dangerous it will work for some time then you get streak of low rolls and your done.

 

[BeeStar]

While this sounds good in theory, the truth is that there is actually no difference in all betting strategies. Also note that a feww is taken from your dices, so it won't be as effective.

 

[malyce]

Actually, your odds don't increase. Period. You could very easily dig a pretty deep hole for yourself if you keep expecting to win big while starting low.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambler's_fallacy

 

[Novaray]

I've tried this and doesnt usually work for me as I usually go on streaks of like 5 wins then 6 losses

 

It would work, but you're not taking in account the 10% host fee. You would end up a bit below what you started out with.

 

[ProDuch]

This is how you get clean one day cause in everything odds can beat yah always remember that.

i used to do this on Online Casino 5years ago. Minimum bet was 1$ and maximum 1000$ (Now its impossible to find those)

bet 1 lose
bet 2 lose
bet 4 lose
bet 8 Lose
bet 16,32,64,128,256 (Always remember its only to gain ur 1$)

Believe or not when i reached 256 i gave up and didnt want to test my chance i leaved cashed out.

 

[KajunSpice]

This does work ,
Just try it on different days and take breaks,
Start with small amounts and work you're way to the top.

 

[Tckr]

Dicing isn't like staking, the odds are not in your favor, it is easier to get cleaned dicing than staking.

 

[Rune Tycoon]

It would work, but you're not taking in account the 10% host fee. You would end up a bit below what you started out with.

not all hosts have fees.

 

[lemon phat]

Chances of winning = 50%

Chances of winning two in a row = 50% x 50% = 25%

Chances of losing two in a row = 50% x 50% = 25%

Chances of losing one and winning one = 50% x 50% = 25% x 2 = 50%

yadda yadda yadda, if you wanna learn more about this method of gambling just make your way to this wikipedia link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martingale_(betting_system)

I think your wrong.
Just because you win one, doesn't mean that changes the %.
EX: chances of losing two in a row=50%
Why? Because it's 50% chance the first roll, and 50% chance the second roll just because you roll low the first time, that doesn't effect the second roll whatso ever (this is just what I think...Its runescape, who knows...)


ANYWAYS!!~!!~!!~!!~!!~!!~!!~

DO NOT DO THIS.... This fails, ive lost 200m doing this

Just stay away from dicing

 

[Sillymonkey]

I think your wrong.
Just because you win one, doesn't mean that changes the %.
EX: chances of losing two in a row=50%
Why? Because it's 50% chance the first roll, and 50% chance the second roll just because you roll low the first time, that doesn't effect the second roll whatso ever

It's not about a roll affecting another, it is about probability.

 

[lemon phat]

It's not about a roll affecting another, it is about probability.

I get that... I guess I'm wrong, I was just thinking on an individual roll... my bad

 

[iHateMyLife]

When you do this you also have to take in account of your opponent's chances too. If you lose like 6 times and he loses 6 times, you both can't win.

 

[shox_bomber]

f it just bet it all at once

 

[EpicGoldShop]

Stake, don't dice.