I will try to keep this as straight forward as possible by breaking down each aspect of this report below;
15 compromised accounts:
@Clearly Killing It you mentioned in the original post on this report that the accounts were prior serviced by @Fur3oon Services:
This leads me back to my original stance on the accounts:
"First, the account was taken as I replaced the account owner with the inferno and quiver"
However, this could be explained as "the account was taken" (the account was banned), and "as I replaced the account owner with the inferno and quiver" (he had to replace the customer's banned account that he ordered the inferno and quiver on by compensating him with the refund). This could also be taken at face value that @Fur3oon Services did in fact take ownership of the account, gave it to the customer, and this would explain why @Fur3oon Services is unable to produce a chatlog regarding the $273.10 USDT refund that he stated he issued to the customer. However, in the same chatlog @Fur3oon Services denies several times (before and after the above statement) having any involvement in the hijacking of the accounts, so I would not be able to explicitly say who attached an email on the account, and securing the account after the services were completed would have prevented this entire aspect of this report.
$580 in service fees:
This has been addressed in the points above. You confirmed several times that the accounts were prior serviced by @Fur3oon Services and given these statements, @Fur3oon Services will not be held liable for any supplies you provided or any service fees you paid.
$600 Deposit:
There is sufficient evidence that 450m 07 was refunded to the customer.
However, @Fur3oon Services if you are unable to provide any chatlogs of the customer agreeing to be refunded $273.10, this will not be included in the amount deemed to have been refunded.
$600 - $90 (450m 07 x .20/m) = $510.
I am going to base this part of the ruling on the most recent precedent regarding withholding a worker's deposit and the fact that there were no terms of service regarding this deposit; deposits are not meant to be used as profit.
@Fur3oon Services please refund @Clearly Killing It $510 of the deposit that was not used to reimburse the customer. You have been issued a DNT until this debt is repaid to @Clearly Killing It, as this is a significant amount of debt owed. I would strongly advise screen recording the refund and keeping the proper documentation of it to prevent any further issues here.
@Clearly Killing It you have also been issued a DNT for scamming, as per your own admission of utilizing bots to complete services on customer accounts, despite the customers being told the services would be done by hand. Please confirm here if/when you have received the refund.
15 compromised accounts:
@Clearly Killing It you mentioned in the original post on this report that the accounts were prior serviced by @Fur3oon Services:
Amount scammed: 13+ osrs accounts that were prior serviced by them
This leads me back to my original stance on the accounts:
There were additional chatlogs between the two of you that were provided, in which @Fur3oon Services said something that could suggest that he did take ownership of one of the accounts in question:Regarding the accounts that were serviced - I have confirmed in the discord server for myself that you did in fact agree to the server's ToS as seen here. The relevant ToS regarding the claim of the accounts being hijacked can be seen here.
@Fur3oon Services will not be held liable for the accounts for the following reasons:
- The services were completed on the accounts and you failed to secure the accounts, despite agreeing to their ToS stating that you would.
- We cannot explicitly prove who attached the emails on the accounts in question, nor can we rule out the possibility of the accounts being serviced by a third party, nor the possibility that you purchased these as legacy accounts and the OO recovered them.
"First, the account was taken as I replaced the account owner with the inferno and quiver"
However, this could be explained as "the account was taken" (the account was banned), and "as I replaced the account owner with the inferno and quiver" (he had to replace the customer's banned account that he ordered the inferno and quiver on by compensating him with the refund). This could also be taken at face value that @Fur3oon Services did in fact take ownership of the account, gave it to the customer, and this would explain why @Fur3oon Services is unable to produce a chatlog regarding the $273.10 USDT refund that he stated he issued to the customer. However, in the same chatlog @Fur3oon Services denies several times (before and after the above statement) having any involvement in the hijacking of the accounts, so I would not be able to explicitly say who attached an email on the account, and securing the account after the services were completed would have prevented this entire aspect of this report.
$580 in service fees:
This has been addressed in the points above. You confirmed several times that the accounts were prior serviced by @Fur3oon Services and given these statements, @Fur3oon Services will not be held liable for any supplies you provided or any service fees you paid.
Unbeknownst to me, they also planned on hacking all of the accounts they had serviced for me prior to this happening.
$600 Deposit:
Just to confirm - there was no set terms of service agreed to regarding @Clearly Killing It working for your server other than he was to provide a $600 deposit, correct?
correct .
There is sufficient evidence that 450m 07 was refunded to the customer.
However, @Fur3oon Services if you are unable to provide any chatlogs of the customer agreeing to be refunded $273.10, this will not be included in the amount deemed to have been refunded.
$600 - $90 (450m 07 x .20/m) = $510.
I am going to base this part of the ruling on the most recent precedent regarding withholding a worker's deposit and the fact that there were no terms of service regarding this deposit; deposits are not meant to be used as profit.
@Fur3oon Services please refund @Clearly Killing It $510 of the deposit that was not used to reimburse the customer. You have been issued a DNT until this debt is repaid to @Clearly Killing It, as this is a significant amount of debt owed. I would strongly advise screen recording the refund and keeping the proper documentation of it to prevent any further issues here.
@Clearly Killing It you have also been issued a DNT for scamming, as per your own admission of utilizing bots to complete services on customer accounts, despite the customers being told the services would be done by hand. Please confirm here if/when you have received the refund.






































